PELATIHAN PENGGUNAAN TRAINER SIMULATOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE SEPEDA MOTOR BAGI GURU SMK NEGERI 3 KARAWANG

Authors

  • Sugeng Priyanto Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Imam Mahir Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Rani Anggrainy Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Agung Gumelar Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Hari Din Nugraha Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Miftah Al Hafidz Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Diandra Keisha Gunadi Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Rizky Malik Arrahman Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/community.v6i2.14906

Keywords:

Kendaraan Listrik, Keselamatan Kerja, Pelatihan Guru, Pendidikan Vokasi, Trainer Simulator Sepeda Motor Listrik

Abstract

The electric motorcycle ecosystem in Indonesia is expanding, yet 2025 sales stood at 55,059 units, down 28.6% from 77,078 units in 2024, and still accounted for less than one percent of national motorcycle sales, leaving vocational high schools (SMK) with automotive programmes short of practical media for this topic. SMK Negeri 3 Karawang faced three problems: teachers' understanding of electric motorcycle architecture was uneven, inspection practice still relied on conventional electrical habits that carry risk on battery-voltage systems, and the school lacked practical media for safe repeated training. This community service programme donated one electric motorcycle simulator trainer unit to the school and trained teachers to operate it through competency-based training held on 23 June 2026, comprising material exposure, demonstration, and hands-on practice, with occupational health and safety (K3) included as training content. Evaluation used a 15-item satisfaction questionnaire on a 1-to-4 scale and a 10-item multiple-choice knowledge test completed by five participating teachers. The mean questionnaire score was 3.80 out of 4.00, categorised as very good, with no item scoring below 3. The mean test score was 184 out of 200, ranging from 170 to 200. Of the 50 test responses analysed, 43 were correct; six items were answered correctly by all participants, while the item on battery specifications was answered correctly by only one participant. The main finding is a split in participant mastery by item type: all participants answered the procedural and occupational safety items correctly, whereas only one answered the battery specification item correctly, directing follow-up mentoring towards reading the technical specification sheet rather than towards operating procedures. The limited number of respondents means the results describe the five teachers who completed the instruments rather than all vocational teachers at the partner school.

ABSTRAK

Ekosistem sepeda motor listrik di Indonesia berkembang, tetapi penjualannya pada 2025 tercatat 55.059 unit, turun 28,6% dari 77.078 unit pada 2024, dan porsinya masih di bawah satu persen dari total penjualan sepeda motor nasional, sehingga sekolah menengah kejuruan (SMK) program keahlian otomotif belum banyak memiliki media praktik untuk topik ini. SMK Negeri 3 Karawang menghadapi tiga persoalan, yaitu pemahaman guru terhadap arsitektur sepeda motor listrik yang belum merata, praktik pemeriksaan yang masih mengacu pada kebiasaan kelistrikan konvensional, padahal berisiko terhadap sistem bertegangan baterai, dan ketiadaan media praktik untuk berlatih berulang secara aman. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini menghibahkan satu unit trainer simulator sepeda motor listrik kepada sekolah dan melatih guru menggunakannya melalui pelatihan berbasis kompetensi pada 23 Juni 2026, mencakup pemaparan materi, demonstrasi, dan praktik langsung, dengan keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (K3) sebagai salah satu materi. Evaluasi menggunakan angket kepuasan 15 butir berskala 1 sampai 4 dan tes pengetahuan pilihan ganda 10 butir yang diisi oleh lima guru peserta. Rerata skor angket sebesar 3,80 dari 4,00 pada kategori sangat baik, tanpa satu pun butir bernilai di bawah 3. Rerata skor tes sebesar 184 dari 200, dengan rentang 170 sampai 200. Dari 50 jawaban tes yang dianalisis, 43 jawaban benar; enam butir dijawab benar oleh seluruh peserta, sedangkan butir tentang spesifikasi baterai hanya dijawab benar oleh satu peserta. Temuan utamanya adalah penguasaan peserta yang terbelah menurut jenis materi: butir prosedural dan butir keselamatan kerja dikuasai seluruh peserta, sedangkan butir hafalan spesifikasi baterai dikuasai satu peserta, sehingga pendampingan lanjutan diarahkan pada pembacaan lembar spesifikasi teknis dan bukan pada prosedur pengoperasian. Jumlah responden yang terbatas membuat hasil ini berlaku bagi lima peserta yang mengisi instrumen, bukan bagi seluruh guru produktif sekolah mitra.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, H., Botha, S., & Booysen, M. J. (2026). A validated physics-based powertrain model for an electric motorcycle in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 17(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj17020090

Anwar, M., Triyono, M. B., Ta'ali, T., Hidayat, H., & Syahputeri, V. N. (2021). Design of trainer kit as a fault-finding based on electricity and electronics learning media. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 11(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v11i2.43742

Ebrahim, E. A. (2023). Real-time implementation of BLDC motor-based intelligent tracking control fed from PV-array for e-bike applications. WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems, 18, 270–281. https://doi.org/10.37394/232016.2023.18.28

Gallo, R., Monopoli, T., Zampolli, M., Jaboeuf, R. J. P., Tosco, P., Patti, E., & Aliberti, A. (2025). A novel procedure for real-time SOH estimation of EV battery packs based on time series extrinsic regression. IEEE Access, 13, 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3516215

Ge, Z., Xu, Y., & Zhang, B. (2024). Parts simulation design and simulation training system combined with hardware-in-the-loop. International Journal for Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, 15, 13. https://doi.org/10.1051/smdo/2024008

Ghantasala, N. R., & Koperundevi, G. (2026). Analysis of harmonics injected by fast charging stations with non-linear loads and performance evaluation of mitigation methods for shunt active filter. Engineering Research Express, 8(6), 065306. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ae4f55

Guran, I.-C., Florescu, A., & Perisoara, L. A. (2024). SPICE model of a passive battery management system. IEEE Access, 12, 4000–4014. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3349186

Hammer, T., Mitsching, T., Heydrich, M., & Ivanov, V. (2025). Optimisation and evaluation of a fuzzy-based one-pedal driving strategy for enhancing energy efficiency and driving comfort. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(11), 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16110608

International Electrotechnical Commission. (2017). IEC 61851-1:2017. Electric vehicle conductive charging system Part 1: General requirements. IEC.

International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO 13063-2:2022. Electrically propelled mopeds and motorcycles Safety specifications Part 2: Protection against electric shock. ISO.

Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia Nomor 45 Tahun 2020 tentang Kendaraan Tertentu dengan Menggunakan Penggerak Motor Listrik. Kemenhub RI.

Khalid, A., Stevenson, A., & Sarwat, A. I. (2021). Performance analysis of commercial passive balancing battery management system operation using a hardware-in-the-loop testbed. Energies, 14(23), 8037. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238037

Kompas.com. (2026, 6 Januari). Penjualan motor listrik 2025 turun 28,6%. https://otomotif.kompas.com/read/2026/01/06/070200915/penjualan-motor-listrik-2025-turun-28-6-

Kouba, N. E. L. Y., Yadel, N., Amrani, A. A., Amrane, A., & Ghaouli, N. (2024). Educational simulator of smart grid (ESSG). Engineering Proceedings, 67(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024067071

Lee, Z. J., Sharma, S., Johansson, D., & Low, S. H. (2021). ACN-Sim: An open-source simulator for data-driven electric vehicle charging research. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 12(6), 5113–5123. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2021.3103156

Leone, E., & Papurello, D. (2026). Fire safety analysis of alternative vehicles in confined spaces: A study of underground parking facilities. Fire, 9(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9010020

Li, L., Liu, B., Zheng, W., Wu, X., Song, L., & Dong, W. (2022). Investigation and numerical reconstruction of a full-scale electric bicycle fire experiment in high-rise residential building. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 37, 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102304

Li, X., Chen, S., Wei, R., Huang, S., & Ren, Z. (2024). The effect of water mist nozzle settings on fire suppression of electric vehicles in garages. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 60, 104803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.104803

Maghfiroh, M. F. N., Pandyaswargo, A. H., & Onoda, H. (2021). Current readiness status of electric vehicles in Indonesia: Multistakeholder perceptions. Sustainability, 13(23), 13177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313177

Malik, M. N., Soenarto, S., & Sudarsono, F. X. (2018). The competency-based training model for vocational high school teachers from electrical expertise programs. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 8(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v8i3.19877

Misbah, Z., Gulikers, J., Dharma, S., & Mulder, M. (2020). Evaluating competence-based vocational education in Indonesia. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 72(4), 488–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2019.1635634

Naresh, K., Suresh, D., & Pattnaik, S. (2025). High-voltage gain DC–DC converter for sensorless speed control of BLDC motor. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 53(11), 6243–6267. https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.4509

Nerkar, M., Goyal, G. R., Mukherjee, A., & Soni, B. P. (2025). Enhancing battery safety and performance through advanced cooling solutions for electric vehicles. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 43(6), 2198–2212. https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2025.1936

Ramdhani, R., Sriyono, S., & Munawar, W. (2024). The fabrication of electric motorcycle trainers to eliminate automotive misconceptions. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 14(2), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v14i2.55034

Supraptono, E., Wibowo, A., Wijaya, M. B. R., Rohman, S., Siraj, U., & Qunefi, F. (2025). Development of an electric motorcycle trainer kit as a learning medium for electrical engineering and automotive engineering majors in vocational high schools. Jurnal Abdimas, 29(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.15294/pvn4eh96

Wang, Z., Zeng, S., & Guo, J. (2021). Understanding the influence of state of health on the range anxiety of battery electric vehicle drivers. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 15(2), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.12023

Wu, Q., You, Z., Li, J., Wu, T., & Luo, L. (2023). Evaluating electromagnetic interference for fault analysis and maintenance in new energy vehicles. Electrica, 23(2), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.5152/ELECTRICA.2023.22120

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Priyanto, S., Mahir, I., Anggrainy, R., Gumelar, A., Nugraha, H. D., Miftah Al Hafidz, … Arrahman, R. M. (2026). PELATIHAN PENGGUNAAN TRAINER SIMULATOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE SEPEDA MOTOR BAGI GURU SMK NEGERI 3 KARAWANG. COMMUNITY : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(2), 1580–1591. https://doi.org/10.51878/community.v6i2.14906

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)