PERSEPSI GURU TENTANG FAIRNESS DALAM ASESMEN PENDIDIKAN: STUDI KUALITATIF PADA GURU SEKOLAH MENENGAH DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/paedagogy.v6i3.13004Keywords:
Fairness, Asesmen Pendidikan, Persepsi GuruAbstract
Fairness in educational assessment is a fundamental principle shaping the quality of teacher-student relationships and the meaningfulness of the learning process. A preliminary study conducted in several secondary schools in Jakarta, Semarang, and Banjarbaru found that some teachers still base their assessment practices on personal experience and institutional pressure, without a clear conceptual grounding in fairness. This study aims to explore in depth how secondary school teachers interpret and practice fairness in educational assessment. The study employed a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with five teachers from junior high, senior high, and vocational school levels in public schools. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase thematic analysis, encompassing familiarization with the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the report. The findings reveal six major themes: teacher identity, emotion, and professional development; teacher-student relationships and classroom management; assessment systems and learning evaluation; curriculum and education policy; inclusive education and student diversity; and professional collaboration and learning innovation. The findings indicate that teachers' perceptions of fairness are neither singular nor static, but are dynamically constructed through the interaction of emotional experience, interpersonal relationships with students, curriculum policy demands, and the need to accommodate students with special needs. Teachers conceive of fairness not as uniform treatment, but as the adjustment of assessment to each student's condition, effort, and character. This study contributes to the development of a contextual fairness model for assessment that reflects the realities of education in Indonesia and provides a basis for designing teacher professional development programs related to fair assessment literacy.
ABSTRAK
Keadilan (fairness) dalam asesmen pendidikan merupakan prinsip penting yang menentukan kualitas hubungan antara guru dan peserta didik serta kebermaknaan proses belajar. Studi pendahuluan di beberapa sekolah menengah di Jakarta, Semarang, dan Banjarbaru menemukan bahwa sebagian guru masih mendasarkan praktik penilaian pada pengalaman pribadi dan tekanan institusional, tanpa pijakan konsep fairness yang jelas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi secara mendalam bagaimana guru sekolah menengah memaknai dan mempraktikkan fairness dalam asesmen pendidikan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode wawancara semi-terstruktur terhadap lima guru dari jenjang SMP, SMA, dan SMK di sekolah negeri. Data dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik enam tahap dari Braun dan Clarke, meliputi pengenalan data, pembuatan kode awal, pencarian tema, peninjauan tema, penamaan tema, dan penyusunan laporan. Hasil penelitian mengungkap enam tema utama, yaitu identitas, emosi, dan pengembangan guru; hubungan guru-siswa dan manajemen kelas; sistem penilaian dan evaluasi pembelajaran; kurikulum dan kebijakan pendidikan; pendidikan inklusif dan keberagaman siswa; serta kolaborasi profesional dan inovasi pembelajaran. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa persepsi guru tentang fairness tidak bersifat tunggal dan statis, melainkan terbentuk secara dinamis melalui interaksi antara pengalaman emosional, relasi interpersonal dengan siswa, tuntutan kebijakan kurikulum, dan kebutuhan akomodasi bagi siswa berkebutuhan khusus. Guru memaknai keadilan bukan sebagai penyamaan perlakuan, tetapi sebagai penyesuaian penilaian terhadap kondisi, usaha, dan karakter masing-masing siswa. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi pada pengembangan model fairness dalam asesmen yang kontekstual dengan realitas pendidikan di Indonesia, serta menjadi dasar bagi penyusunan program pengembangan profesional guru terkait literasi asesmen yang adil.
Downloads
References
Apelehin, A. A., Imohiosen, C. E., Ajuluchukwu, P., Abutu, D. E., Udeh, C. A., & Iguma, D. R. (2025). Assessment and evaluation for social improvement in education: Strategies for equity and fairness. International Journal of Social Science Exceptional Research, 4(1), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.54660/ijsser.2025.4.1.119-125
Ardiansyah, A., Anshori, T. A., Zakaria, Z., & Cahyanto, B. (2022). Principles of online learning assessment: A literature review between Western education theory and Islamic education theory. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 19(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2022.191-02
Asamoah, D., Shahr?ll, M., & Latif, S. N. A. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of school assessment climate and realities of assessment practices in two educational contexts. Frontiers in Education, 9, Artikel 1278187. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1278187
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Faizah, H., & Kamal, R. (2024). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(1), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i1.6735
Fajri, I., Remiswal, R., & Khadijah, K. (2025). Makna pengalaman guru dalam evaluasi afektif: Studi fenomenologis di Madrasah Aliyah Iqra. Edu Society: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v5i2.1028
Hackerson, E. L., Slominski, T., Johnson, N., Buncher, J. B., Ismael, S., Singelmann, L., Leontyev, A., Knopps, A. G., McDarby, A., Nguyen, J. J., Condry, D. L. J., Nyachwaya, J., Wissman, K. T., Falkner, W., Grieger, K., Montplaisir, L., Hodgson, A., & Momsen, J. L. (2024). Alternative grading practices in undergraduate STEM education: A scoping review. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6(1), Artikel 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-024-00106-8
Hidayati, N. O., & Andriyanti, E. (2025). Validating a diagnostic reading test for junior high school EFL learners in Indonesia’s English massive program using QUEST. Al-Lisan, 10(2), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v10i2.6708
Kelly, S., Bringe, R., Aucejo, E., & Fruehwirth, J. C. (2020). Using global observation protocols to inform research on teaching effectiveness and school improvement: Strengths and emerging limitations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28, Artikel 62. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5012
Kristiyaningsih, D. L., Rohayati, E., Rusana, R. P. I., & Abdillah, F. (2026). Studi literatur: Metode signifikan dan obyek pendidikan inklusif dalam kebijakan pemerintah. MANAJERIAL: Jurnal Inovasi Manajemen Dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 6(1), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.51878/manajerial.v6i1.9400
Limeranto, J. T., & Kuswandono, P. (2023). Coping with emotions in professional lives: Novice teachers’ voices in Indonesian secondary schools. LITERA, 22(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v22i1.52405
Monteiro, V., Mata, L., & Santos, N. N. (2021). Assessment conceptions and practices: Perspectives of primary school teachers and students. Frontiers in Education, 6, Artikel 631185. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.631185
Mustika, D., Ambiyar, A., & Aziz, I. (2021). Proses penilaian hasil belajar Kurikulum 2013 di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 6158–6167. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1819
Nababan, A., Nduru, E., Lubis, L., & Sitorus, H. (2025). Membentuk peserta didik memahami pentingnya kesempatan yang sama dalam memperoleh pendidikan dan pekerjaan. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Agama dan Filsafat, 4(3), 726–739. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrafi.v4i3.7350
Normayani, R., & Ishart?w?, I. (2025). Kindergarten teachers’ competence in designing inclusive lesson plans through guided training. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies, 26(4), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v26i4.1689
Pengky, P., Octavia, O., Seruyanti, N., Endri, E., & Munthe, Y. (2023). Fluktuasi pembelajaran-peziarahan-profesionalitas-kode etik guru di Indonesia. Jurnal Pengajaran Sekolah Dasar, 2(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.56855/jpsd.v2i1.335
Purnomo, A. S., Sodiq, S., Amri, M., & Jatmiko, H. T. P. (2025). Studi fenomenologi: Pengalaman guru dalam menerapkan penilaian portofolio digital pada pembelajaran teks biografi kelas XI SMA. Lingua Franca: Jurnal Bahasa Sastra dan Pengajarannya, 9(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.30651/lf.v9i2.26255
Putri, Z. A., Rahmadayani, R., & Syamsiah, N. (2024). For assesment dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran cerita hikayat pada siswa sekolah menengah atas. EDUKATIF: JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 6(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i1.5981
Ruig, N. J. de, Jong, P. F. de, & Zee, M. (2023). Stimulating elementary school students’ self-regulated learning through high-quality interactions and relationships: A narrative review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), Artikel 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09795-5
Sekarinasih, A., Arif, M., & Waseso, H. P. (2025). Analisis kebijakan pendidikan inklusif di sekolah dasar/madrasah ibtidaiyah: Perspektif keadilan dan pemerataan akses pendidikan. Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v13i3.15549
Sun, X., & Yang, L. (2021). A narrative case study of Chinese senior high school English teachers’ emotions: An ecological perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Artikel 792400. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.792400
Wahyuni, F., & Herlinda, H. (2021). Paradigma pembelajaran efektif bahasa dan sastra Indonesia. Gurindam: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.24014/gjbs.v1i2.12786
Zainullah, Z., Mahfud, M., & Riniati, W. O. (2023). Exploring the role of teacher-student relationships in academic achievement: A qualitative study in primary schools. The Eastasouth Journal of Learning and Educations, 1(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.58812/esle.v1i02.111
Zee, M., Rudasill, K. M., & Bosman, R. J. (2020). A cross-lagged study of students’ motivation, academic achievement, and relationships with teachers from kindergarten to 6th grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1208–1226. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000574
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shierly Luthfia Shalsa, Aprilia Rambe, Intan Baiduri, Rachmadiar Perdana, Hazatriningrum Kusumawati, Indri Hapsari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.














