THE NEW AVENGERS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND TEAMWORK IN DIGITAL ACTIVISM – A LITERATURE REVIEW

Authors

  • Serly Andriani Kusnadi Master of Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Herdiyan Maulana Master of Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Zarina Akbar Master of Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/paedagogy.v6i3.12968

Keywords:

Social Justice, Online Activism, Digital Activism, Social-Psychological Factors

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Obstacles to channeling conventional political aspirations and the prevalence of systemic discrimination in the public sphere are the background to this article. These issues trigger sociopsychological alienation, which drives the emergence of independent collective movements in cyberspace. The main focus of this theoretical study is to comprehensively explore the central role of social justice and teamwork in mapping the phenomenon of digital movements driven by a new generation of activists called The New Avengers. The research steps were carried out using a narrative literature review method that adopted the selection principles of the PRISMA framework. The secondary data screening procedure systematically synthesized twenty original scientific articles from Scopus, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases published over the past ten years. Thematic synthesis-based research findings indicate that the principle of social justice serves as a core motivation and fundamental goal of the movement. Digital platforms have proven to provide powerful tools for narrative amplification, fostering solidarity among marginalized groups, and coordinating collective action in real time. The main conclusion emphasizes that although cyberspace offers freedom of expression, the success of digital activism is heavily influenced by cyber structural barriers, the threat of antagonism, and the repressive dynamics of authoritarian networks. Activists are recommended to draft a strategy to strengthen critical media literacy and inclusive collaborative ethics to ensure the sustainability of the impact of social change.

 

ABSTRAK

Hambatan penyaluran aspirasi politik konvensional serta maraknya diskriminasi sistemik di ruang publik melatarbelakangi penulisan artikel ini. Masalah tersebut memicu alienasi sosiopsikologis yang mendorong munculnya gerakan kolektif independen di ruang siber. Fokus utama kajian teoretis ini adalah mengeksplorasi secara komprehensif peran sentral keadilan sosial serta kerja sama tim dalam memetakan fenomena pergerakan digital yang digerakkan oleh generasi aktivis baru bernama The New Avengers. Langkah-langkah penelitian dijalankan menggunakan metode tinjauan literatur naratif (narrative literature review) yang mengadopsi prinsip seleksi kerangka kerja PRISMA. Prosedur penyaringan data sekunder secara sistematis menyintesis dua puluh artikel ilmiah orisinal dari basis data Scopus, PsycINFO, dan Google Scholar dalam rentang publikasi sepuluh tahun terakhir. Temuan riset berbasis sintesis tematik menunjukkan bahwa prinsip keadilan sosial berfungsi sebagai motivasi inti dan tujuan fundamental pergerakan. Platform digital terbukti menyediakan alat yang ampuh untuk amplifikasi narasi, penggalangan solidaritas kelompok marjinal, serta koordinasi tindakan kolektif secara real-time. Simpulan utama menegaskan bahwa meskipun ruang siber menawarkan kebebasan ekspresi, tingkat keberhasilan aktivisme digital sangat dipengaruhi oleh hambatan struktural siber, ancaman antagonisme, dan dinamika represi jaringan otoriter. Para aktivis direkomendasikan menyusun draf strategi penguatan literasi media kritis dan etika kolaborasi inklusif demi menjamin keberlanjutan dampak perubahan sosial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2016). Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215581430

Choi, A., D’ignazio, C., Welles, B. F., & Parker, A. G. (2023). Social media as a critical pedagogical tool: Examining the relationship between youths’ online sociopolitical engagements and their critical consciousness. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Artikel 23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580823

Colton, J. S., & Holmes, S. (2018). A social justice theory of active equality for technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 48(1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616647803

Dal, A., Nisbet, E. C., & Kamenchuk, O. (2023). Signaling silence: Affective and cognitive responses to risks of online activism about corruption in an authoritarian context. New Media & Society, 25(3), 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135861

Fatima, I., Pehrson, S., & Jogdand, Y. (2025). Dalit activists promote social change differently: Challenges and opportunities of digital activism and social change in Indian society. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 35(2), Artikel e70079. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70079

Ferman, B. (2021). The role of social justice frameworks in an era of neoliberalism: Lessons from youth activism. Journal of Urban Affairs, 43(3), 436–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1734012

Fisher, E. S. (2020). Cultural humility as a form of social justice: Promising practices for global school psychology training. School Psychology International, 41(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034319893097

Fleming, J., & Ward, D. (2017). Self-directed groupwork – social justice through social action and empowerment. Critical and Radical Social Work, 5(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986016X14822509544479

Gomez, E. M., & Kaiser, C. R. (2019). From pixels to protest: Using the internet to confront bias at the societal level. Dalam Confronting prejudice and discrimination: The science of changing minds and behaviors (pp. 319–335). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814715-3.00011-4

Greijdanus, H., de Matos Fernandes, C. A., Turner-Zwinkels, F., Honari, A., Roos, C. A., Rosenbusch, H., & Postmes, T. (2020). The psychology of online activism and social movements: Relations between online and offline collective action. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.003

Hailes, H. P., Ceccolini, C. J., Gutowski, E., & Liang, B. (2020). Ethical guidelines for social justice in psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 51(6), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000291

Klar, M., & Kasser, T. (2009). Some benefits of being an activist: Measuring activism and its role in psychological well-being. Political Psychology, 30(5), 755–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00724.x

Krispenz, A., & Bertrams, A. (2024). Understanding left-wing authoritarianism: Relations to the dark personality traits, altruism, and social justice commitment. Current Psychology, 43(3), 2714–2730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04463-x

Lee, Y., Tao, W., & Li, J. Y. Q. (2022). Motivations of online and offline activism against racism and xenophobia among Asian-American publics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telematics and Informatics, 67, Artikel 101751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101751

Milberry, K. (2012). Hacking for social justice. Dalam (Re)inventing the internet: Critical case studies (pp. 109–130). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-734-9_6

Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550902765508

Museus, S. D., Espiritu, G. L., & Ng, C. (2021). “We really have to come together”: Understanding the role of solidarity in Asian American college students’ social justice activism and advocacy. Education Sciences, 11(11), Artikel 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110683

Noltemeyer, A., & Grapin, S. L. (2021). Working together towards social justice, anti-racism, and equity: A joint commitment from School Psychology International and Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. School Psychology International, 42(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034320977618

Pearce, K. E., & Kendzior, S. (2012). Networked authoritarianism and social media in Azerbaijan. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01633.x

Poorisat, T., Boster, F. J., & Salmon, C. T. (2019). Predicting activism for a social cause. Communication Studies, 70(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1504808

Prilleltensky, I., Di Martino, S., & Ness, O. (2022). Editorial: Psychology for the common good: The interdependence of citizenship, justice, and well-being across the globe. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Artikel 934456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934456

Rogala, P., Moczulska, M., & Vrabelova, A. (2024). Justice and success: How to combine these issues in teamwork? Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarz?dzanie / Politechnika ?l?ska, 191, 441–452. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2024.191.31

Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504

Villalobos, J. P., & Cabrera, V. (2025). A constructive critique: Advancing positive psychology with equity and justice. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 10(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-024-00209-7

Warren, M. A., Donaldson, S. I., & Galport, N. (2022). Using the science of positive psychology in the formative evaluation of social justice interventions: A case example. Evaluation and Program Planning, 91, Artikel 102017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102017

Downloads

Published

2026-07-20

How to Cite

Kusnadi, S. A., Maulana, H., & Akbar, Z. (2026). THE NEW AVENGERS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND TEAMWORK IN DIGITAL ACTIVISM – A LITERATURE REVIEW. PAEDAGOGY : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Psikologi, 6(3), 2834–2850. https://doi.org/10.51878/paedagogy.v6i3.12968

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.