AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS USING GRAMMAR CHECK APP OF SECOND-SEMESTER STUDENTS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION PROGRAM AT TEACHING AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE OF LARANTUKA

Authors

  • Berbara Bota Wato Institut Keguruan dan Teknologi Larantuka
  • Fransiska Jone Mare Institut Keguruan dan Teknologi Larantuka
  • Ummi Qalsum Arif Institut Keguruan dan Teknologi Larantuka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/language.v6i4.15640

Keywords:

kesalahan tata bahasa, esai argumentatif, aplikasi pemeriksa tata bahasa

Abstract

Grammatical errors remain a challenge for students writing argumentative essays because they must develop ideas while applying English grammatical rules accurately. This study aims to analyze the types, frequency, factors, and solutions related to grammatical errors among second-semester students. This study employed a descriptive qualitative design. The participants were 12 students of the English Language Education Program at the Teaching and Technology Institute of Larantuka. The data consisted of argumentative essays, observation field notes, and interviews with students and a lecturer. A grammar-checking application was used as a supporting instrument, while the final identification of errors was determined through manual analysis. The analysis identified 83 errors in six categories: Subject–Verb Agreement, sentence structure, Modal Verb, Verb Tense, articles, and prepositions. Subject–Verb Agreement was the most frequent category, with 49 occurrences (59.04%), followed by sentence structure with 17 occurrences (20.48%). The associated factors included incomplete mastery of grammatical rules, overgeneralization, first-language interference, limited writing practice, and cognitive load. Continuous writing practice, focused grammar instruction, corrective feedback, revision, and responsible use of grammar-checking applications are needed to support students’ grammatical accuracy.

ABSTRAK

Kesalahan tata bahasa masih menjadi kendala bagi mahasiswa dalam menulis esai argumentatif karena mereka harus mengembangkan gagasan sekaligus menerapkan aturan bahasa Inggris secara akurat. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis jenis, frekuensi, faktor, dan solusi terkait kesalahan tata bahasa mahasiswa semester dua. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain deskriptif kualitatif. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas 12 mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Institut Keguruan dan Teknologi Larantuka. Data berupa esai argumentatif, catatan observasi, dan hasil wawancara dengan mahasiswa serta dosen. Aplikasi pemeriksa tata bahasa digunakan sebagai instrumen pendukung, sedangkan kesalahan ditentukan melalui pemeriksaan manual. Ditemukan 83 kesalahan dalam enam kategori, yaitu Subject–Verb Agreement, struktur kalimat, Modal Verb, Verb Tense, artikel, dan preposisi. Kesalahan Subject–Verb Agreement paling dominan dengan 49 kejadian (59,04%), diikuti struktur kalimat sebanyak 17 kejadian (20,48%). Faktor yang berkaitan dengan kesalahan meliputi penguasaan aturan yang belum memadai, generalisasi berlebihan, interferensi bahasa pertama, keterbatasan latihan menulis, dan beban kognitif. Latihan menulis berkelanjutan, pembelajaran tata bahasa terfokus, umpan balik korektif, revisi, dan penggunaan aplikasi pemeriksa tata bahasa secara bertanggung jawab diperlukan untuk mendukung peningkatan ketepatan tata bahasa mahasiswa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ananda, C. R. (2024). EFL students' problems and strategies in writing an argumentative essay [Doctoral dissertation, University of Jambi]. https://repository.unja.ac.id/63931/

Animbrika-Martins, E. J. (2023). ESL students' writing skills: An analysis of writers' attitudes in argumentative essays of senior high school students in the Accra Metropolitan Area [Doctoral dissertation, University of Education Winneba]. https://ir.uew.edu.gh/handle/123456789/4710

Azizah, S. H. N., Baa, S., & Arham, M. (2025). Analysis of EFL students' grammatical errors in writing literature review. Tamaddun, 24(2), 365–371. https://jurnal.fs.umi.ac.id/index.php/tamaddun-life/article/view/1019

Bulqiyah, S., Mahbub, M. A., & Nugraheni, D. A. (2021). Investigating writing difficulties in essay writing: Tertiary students' perspectives. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 4(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v4i1.2371

Dewi, U. (2023). Grammarly as automated writing evaluation: Its effectiveness from EFL students' perceptions. Lingua Cultura, 16(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8315

Florianus, C. C., & Syamsi, V. (2021). Error analysis of inflectional affixation in academic writing of freshman students. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 24(2), 471–492. https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/documents/detail/2405758

Hamdani, M. H., & Abid, N. (2025). Indonesian EFL students' writing challenges: A qualitative meta-analysis. Getsempena English Education Journal, 12(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v12i1.3091

Hanif, M., Susylowati, E., & Yulianti, W. (2026). Grammatical error analysis in the English writing of Indonesian EFL learners. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 6(1), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i01.8175

Harahap, A. (2023). The students' ability in writing compound sentences using the simple past tense at Grade XI of SMA N 2 Kotapinang [Doctoral dissertation, UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan]. https://etd.uinsyahada.ac.id/10079/

Hong, C. H. W. (2025). Examining the impact of writing errors on error processing, comprehension, reception, and identification: A case study of English as a foreign language learners in Cantonese [Doctoral dissertation, UCL (University College London)]. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10203889/

Imansyah, M. P. (2025). Building a strong foundation: Basic grammar and vocabulary. In Speak up! Unlocking English confidence for beginners (p. 12). CV Gita Lentera.

Lin, L. H. F., & Morrison, B. J. (2021). Challenges in academic writing: Perspectives of engineering faculty and L2 postgraduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.03.004

Mubarok, Y., & Budiono, T. (2022). An error analysis on EFL students' writing. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i2.11386

Pasaribu, A. N. (2022). EFL students' perception on English tenses mastery in improving English academic writing. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2612

Putri, D. (2025). The rules of intermediate English grammar. Future Science Publisher.

Ramendra, D. P. (2021). The analysis of grammatical errors in university students' essays. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 54(3), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i3.40951

Suraprajit, P. (2021). An analysis of errors in English essays written by Thai non-English major students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1101.02

Tambunan, A. R. S., Andayani, W., Sari, W. S., & Lubis, F. K. (2022). Investigating EFL students' linguistic problems using Grammarly as automated writing evaluation feedback. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46428

Ummah, L. K., & Bisriyah, M. (2022). EFL students' perception on Grammarly Premium's feedback and dealing with inaccuracies. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 7(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v7i2.1687

Zhafira, A. S. (2026). Analyzing English education department lecturers' strategies in teaching writing [Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung]. https://repository.radenintan.ac.id/43637/

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

How to Cite

Bota Wato, B., Mare, F. J., & Arif , U. Q. (2026). AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAYS USING GRAMMAR CHECK APP OF SECOND-SEMESTER STUDENTS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION PROGRAM AT TEACHING AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE OF LARANTUKA. LANGUAGE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(4), 638–646. https://doi.org/10.51878/language.v6i4.15640

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.