AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' GRAMMATICAL MISTAKES BASED ON CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Sabrina Salsabila Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Siti Ismahani Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Nadhifa Shofi Andara Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Nurul Fadilah Tambunan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Celli Geovani Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/language.v6i3.11952

Keywords:

Analisis Kesalahan, Analisis Kontrastif, Kesalahan Gramatikal, EFL, Pembelajar Indonesia, Interlanguage

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Grammatical errors remain a major challenge for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners in Indonesian higher education. However, studies integrating Error Analysis (EA) and Contrastive Analysis (CA) to identify the sources of errors in the context of Islamic higher education remain limited. This study aims to analyze the grammatical errors made by EFL students through a combined EA and CA approach. A mixed-methods design was employed involving 20 students from the TBI-3 class of the 2023 cohort at the State Islamic University of North Sumatra (UINSU), Medan. Data were collected through essay-writing tasks and analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The findings revealed 300 grammatical errors across six major categories, with subject–verb agreement errors being the most dominant. Most errors were influenced by first-language transfer (Indonesian), supporting the predictions of Contrastive Analysis regarding cross-linguistic influence in second-language acquisition. Inter-rater reliability demonstrated a high level of agreement (κ ≥ 0.81). These findings confirm that the integration of EA and CA is effective in identifying patterns of grammatical errors and can serve as a basis for developing more targeted grammar instruction for Indonesian EFL learners. 

ABSTRAK

Kesalahan gramatikal masih menjadi kendala utama bagi pembelajar bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa asing (EFL) di perguruan tinggi Indonesia. Namun, penelitian yang mengintegrasikan Analisis Kesalahan (Error Analysis/EA) dan Analisis Kontrastif (Contrastive Analysis/CA) untuk mengidentifikasi sumber kesalahan dalam konteks perguruan tinggi Islam masih terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kesalahan gramatikal mahasiswa EFL melalui pendekatan gabungan EA dan CA. Penelitian menggunakan metode campuran (mixed methods) dengan melibatkan 20 mahasiswa kelas TBI-3 Angkatan 2023 di Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara (UINSU), Medan. Data diperoleh melalui tugas menulis karangan dan dianalisis secara kuantitatif serta kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat 300 kesalahan gramatikal dalam enam kategori utama, dengan kesalahan kesesuaian subjek-predikat sebagai bentuk yang paling dominan. Sebagian besar kesalahan dipengaruhi oleh transfer bahasa pertama (Bahasa Indonesia), sehingga mendukung prediksi Analisis Kontrastif mengenai pengaruh lintas bahasa dalam pemerolehan bahasa kedua. Reliabilitas antarpenilai menunjukkan tingkat kesepakatan yang tinggi (κ ≥ 0,81). Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa integrasi EA dan CA efektif untuk mengidentifikasi pola kesalahan gramatikal serta dapat menjadi dasar pengembangan pembelajaran tata bahasa yang lebih tepat bagi pembelajar EFL Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ma, K., Cavanagh, M., Zhang, J., & Chutiyami, M. (2025). The association between teacher self-efficacy and student academic performance: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Educational Research Review, 48, 100701. 10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100701

Octasary, M., Nahdawati, N., & Widyasti Anwar, I. (2025). Grammatical Competence in EFL

Learners: A Quantitative Study on the Misuse of ’To Be’ at University Level. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(3), 826–831. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i3.44320

Yuntika, A. R., Anggreni, A., Jamiluddin, J., & Usman, S. (2025). Writing Errors Analysis:

Subject-Verb Agreement Made by EFL Students. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(5), 889-894. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i5.1538

Azizah, S. H. N., Baa, S., & Arham, M. (2025). Analysis of EFL Students’ Grammatical Errors in Writing Literature Review. Tamaddun, 24(2), 365-

371. https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v24i2.1019

Siti Ismahani, Sofiyani Nasution, Rizky Ummi Thahira Nasution, Indah Permatasari Harahap,

& Gairah Riski Harahap. (2024). Contrastive and Error Analysis of Indonesian

Learners’ Tense and Aspect Usage in English Writing . Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sastra Inggris, 4(3), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v4i3.6299

Rusdi, M., Thamrin, N. S., Nadrun, N., Maghfira, M., & Maf'ulah, M. U. (2025). Rethinking

EFL Grammar Instruction: Enhancing Student Outcomes through Self-Assessment in

EFL Classrooms. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 7(3), 250-262. https://doi.org/10.31849/hr6jaz03

Putri, A. A., & Sukesi, E. (2023). EFL Students’ Difficulties on Using Subject-Verb Agreement. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 7(3), 703-716. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.7.3.703-716

Nurhayati, D. A. W. (2022). The relevance of adopting proofreading tools to maintain academic writing integrity and coherence text. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 7(2), 373. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v7i2.547

Pasaribu, A. N., Pasaribu, T. K., Siahaan, R. B., & Sitompul, D. S. (2024). Challenges for

Indonesian EFL students in English academic writing. English Review: Journal of

English Education, 12(2), 527-536. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i2.9780

Bannò, S., Knill, K., & Gales, M. J. (2024). Grammatical error feedback: An implicit evaluation approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09565. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.09565

Coyne, S. et al. (2025). Annotating Errors in English Learners’ Written Language Production: Advancing Automated Written Feedback Systems. In: Cristea, A.I., Walker, E., Lu, Y., Santos, O.C., Isotani, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2025. Lecture

Notes in Computer Science(), vol 15880. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783-031-98459-4_21

Heywood, D., Carrier, J. A., & Hwang, K. H. (2025). A Taxonomy of Errors in English as she is spoke: Toward an AI-Based Method of Error Analysis for EFL Writing

Instruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00392. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.00392

Mahdalena, N. I. M. (2021). ERROR ANALYSIS OF EFL STUDENTS’ABILITY IN USING

SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Bina Bangsa

Getsempena). https://eprints.bbg.ac.id/id/eprint/239

Nguyen, H. M., & Chu, T. A. (2024). Written corrective feedback in second language writing:

A review of research. Reflections, 31(2), 858-870. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v31i2.275269

Lathifah, Z. K., Fauziah, S. P., Monaya, N., Rachma, F. M., & Tyas, M. (2026). Analysis of Pronunciation Errors in Reading Arabic Language Texts: Case Study of Islamic

Educational Management Students. International Journal of Language

Education, 10(1), 130-146. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1506197

Ulviani, M. (2025). Error analysis in Indonesian language learning: A case study on University students’ writing. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7598767/v1

Nurhayati, D. (2022). The Relevance of Adopting Proofreading Tools to Maintain Academic

Writing Integrity and Coherence Text. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 7(2), 373-396. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v7i2.547

Astuti, A., Apriani, E., & Hidayah, J. (2022). The Correlation between Students’ Autonomous Learning toward Students’ English Achievement in Online Learning (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN CURUP). http://e-theses.iaincurup.ac.id/id/eprint/1492

Zhai, Y. Automated written corrective feedback: fostering writing accuracy, self-regulation, and motivational dynamics in EFL learners. BMC Psychol 14, 46 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03765-y

Shiddiq, S. M. M., & Oktaviani, L. (2022). Interlanguage concerning fossilization and universal grammar: A literature review on second and foreign language acquisition. Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes (JEASP), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.18860/jeasp.v5i2.18998

Rifiyanti, H., & Dewi, D.U. (2022). Error Types In Subject-Verb Agreement. Jurnal

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Proficiency. https://doi.org/10.32503/proficiency.v4i2.2757

Suryantari, H. (2025). An Error Analysis on the Use of Simple Present Tense in Descriptive

Texts Written by Pre-service Elementary Teachers. Journal of English Language and

Education, 10(6), 1414-1429. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i6.2067

Ulviani, M., & Kemala, R. (2025). Linguistic challenges in Indonesian academic writing: An error analysis perspective. Indonesian Journal of Academic Writing Studies, 1(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17149120

Auni, L., & Manan, A. (2022). Contrastive analysis of English and Indonesian adverbs. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 10(1), 88-106. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v10i1.14692

Luthfianda, S., Irawan, Y., Rahayu, R., & Hidayat, S. (2024). EXPLORING Pronunciation

Challenges: Indonesian University Students'production Of English Fricative Sounds. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(1), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i1.7606

Al-khresheh, M. H. (2024). Phonetic challenges in English: the impact of mispronunciation of the bilabial plosive/p/on communication among Saudi EFL learners. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2390777. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2390777

Adhabia, L., & Malihah, N. (2025, December). Interlanguage Development and Auxiliary Verb

Errors in EFL Writing: Insights for Intercultural Understanding and Peacebuilding in Diverse Indonesian Classrooms. In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, PEACE, AND SOCIAL JUSTICE (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 194-208).

https://conferences.uinsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/cepaso/article/view/842

Ullah, A., & Shfaqat, Y. (2026). Error Analysis: An Analysis Of Subject–Verb Agreement

Errors Of Esl Undergraduate Students. Liberal Journal of Language & Literature Review, 4(1), 1493-1507. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20133712

Octasary, M., Nahdawati, N., & Anwar, I. W. (2025). Grammatical Competence in EFL

Learners: A Quantitative Study on the Misuse of'To Be'at University Level. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(3), 826-831. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i3.44320

Ibrahim, M. M. M., & Ibrahim, A. I. (2020). An analysis of grammatical errors in academic writing of EFL students. Asian Journal of Social Science and Management

Technology, 2(6), 81-90.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348650319_An_Analysis_of_Grammatical_Errors _in_Academic_Writing_of_EFL_Students

Zebua, T. J., Maruao, N., Zega, R., & Harefa, A. T. (2025). Analysis Of Error In Simple Past

Tense Usage In Writing Narrative Text In English By 3rd Semester English Education

Students At Universitas Nias In 2024. Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal

Kelitbangan, 13(01). https://doi.org/10.35450/jip.v13i01.903

Zee, M., Koomen, H. M., Jellesma, F. C., Geerlings, J., & de Jong, P. F. (2016). Inter-and intraindividual differences in teachers' self-efficacy: A multilevel factor exploration. Journal of school psychology, 55, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.12.003

Downloads

Published

2026-06-21

How to Cite

Salsabila, S., Ismahani, S., Andara, N. S., Tambunan, N. F., & Geovani, C. (2026). AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL MISTAKES BASED ON CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS. LANGUAGE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(3), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.51878/language.v6i3.11952

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)