PENGEMBANGAN SOAL MATEMATIKA TIPE PISA DENGAN KONTEKS CABANG OLAHRAGA BULU TANGKIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/teaching.v2i2.1295Keywords:
PISA, Design Research, Kemampuan Literasi MatematisAbstract
This study aims to produce PISA-like math problems with uncertainty and data content in the context of the badminton sport that is valid and practical, as well as to see the potential effect of the questions made on the mathematical literacy skills of class X high school students. The research subjects were students of class X SMA Negeri 3 Prabumulih. The research methodology used is design research with the type of development study, which is divided into 2 stages, those are preliminary and formative evaluation. The preliminary stage includes analysis of research subjects, curriculum, PISA framework, mathematical literacy skills, and making question instruments. The formative evaluation stage includes one to one along with an expert review, then a small group, then a field test. The results of the research data analysis showed that: (1) the PISA-like questions that had been developed were declared valid and practical. Valid based on expert review. Practically based on one to one and small group. (2) PISA-like questions that have been developed have a potential effect on students' mathematical literacy skills. The most widely applied mathematical literacy skills are communication skills.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan soal matematika tipe PISA konten uncertainty and data dengan konteks cabang olahraga bulu tangkis yang valid dan praktis, serta melihat efek potensial dari soal yang dibuat terhadap kemampuan literasi matematis siswa kelas X SMA. Subyek penelitian adalah siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 3 Prabumulih. Metodologi penelitian yang digunakan adalah design research dengan tipe development study, yang terbagi menjadi 2 tahap yaitu preliminary dan formative evaluation. Tahap preliminary meliputi analisis subjek penelitian, kurikulum, framework PISA, kemampuan literasi matematis, dan membuat instrumen soal. Tahap formative evaluation meliputi one to one yang bersamaan dengan expert review, selanjutnya small group, kemudian field test. Hasil dari analisis data penelitian diperoleh bahwa: (1) soal-soal tipe PISA yang telah dikembangkan dinyatakan valid dan praktis. Valid berdasarkan pada expert review. Praktis berdasarkan pada one to one dan small group. (2) soal-soal tipe PISA yang telah dikembangkan memiliki efek potensial terhadap kemampuan literasi matematis siswa. Kemampuan literasi matematis yang paling banyak diterapkan yaitu kemampuan komunikasi.
Downloads
References
Fitra, D., Putri, R.I.I., & Susanti, E. (2018). Soal Serupa PISA Menggunakan Konteks Cabang Olahraga Lari. Jurnal Inovasi Edukasi, 1(1), 8-22.
Jurnaidi & Zulkardi. (2014). Pengembangan Soal Model PISA Konten Change And Relationship untuk Mengetahui Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 25-42.
Mardhiyanti, D., Putri, R.I.I., & Kesumawati, N. (2011). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model PISA Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Mathematics Education Journal.5(1).
Merpaung, Y., & Julie, H. (2011). PMRI dan PISA: Suatu Usaha Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. Paper. Diambil dari https://www.usd.ac.id/fakultas/pendidikan/pen_matematika/f1l3/PMRI%20dan%20PISA.pdf
Novita, R., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2012). Exploring Primary Student’s Problem-Solving Ability by Doing Tasks Like PISA’s Question. Journal Mathematic Education.3(2), 133-150.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-year-old know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do, Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science Volume 1. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Result (Volume 1): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD.
Putri, R.I.I. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) Bagi Guru Matematika Sumatera Selatan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Evaluasi Pendidikan.1(1), 522-527.
Stacey, K. (2010). Mathematical and Scientific Literacy Around The World. Journal of Science and Mathematics.33(1), 1-16.
Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations. London: Kogan Page. Diambil dari http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=pisa
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1996). Assessment and realistic mathematics Education. Utrecht: CD-B Press.
Wijaya, A., Heuvel-Panhuizen, M.v.d., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in Solving Context-Based (PISA). Journal The Mathematics Enthusiast.11(3), 555-584.
Zulkardi. (2006). Formative Evaluation : What, why, when, and how. Diambil dari http://www.oocities.org/zulkardi/books.html.
Zulkardi, & Putri, R.I.I. (2006). Mendesain Sendiri Soal Kontekstual Matematika. Prosiding KNM13. Semarang. Diambil dari http://eprints.unsri.ac.id/610/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 TEACHING : Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.