MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SUDIANG (SUMMARY, DISCUSSION, ANALYSIS, GO INTO ACTION) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS PESERTA DIDIK DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/strategi.v5i4.7433Keywords:
Model Pembelajaran SUDIANG, Berpikir Kritis, Pembelajaran BiologiAbstract
ABSTRACT
This article is motivated by the need for a learning model that can integrate conceptual mastery with the development of critical thinking skills in accordance with the demands of the Merdeka Curriculum and 21st-century learning. The purpose of this article is to conceptually examine the SUDIANG (Summary, Discussion, Analysis, Go Into Action) learning model as an innovative strategy to enhance students’ critical thinking skills in Biology learning. This study employs a literature review method by analyzing various relevant national and international research published between 2015 and 2024. The findings reveal that the SUDIANG model is rooted in social constructivism and reflective learning theories, emphasizing active student engagement through activities of summarizing, discussing, analyzing, and applying biological concepts in real-life contexts. Each stage contributes to strengthening students’ cognitive, metacognitive, and affective domains, thereby supporting the development of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS), scientific collaboration, and scientific literacy. The model also aligns with the orientation of the Merdeka Curriculum, which emphasizes contextual and project-based learning. Therefore, SUDIANG can serve as a reflective, comprehensive, and adaptive learning model that meets the demands of 21st-century education, particularly in improving critical thinking skills and the application of biological concepts in everyday life.
ABSTRAK
Penulisan artikel ini dilatarbelakangi oleh kebutuhan akan model pembelajaran yang mampu mengintegrasikan penguasaan konsep dan pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kritis sesuai tuntutan Kurikulum Merdeka dan pembelajaran abad ke-21. Tujuan penulisan artikel ini adalah untuk mengkaji secara konseptual model pembelajaran SUDIANG (Summary, Discussion, Analysis, Go Into Action) sebagai strategi inovatif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik dalam pembelajaran Biologi. Penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode studi literatur (literature review) dengan menganalisis berbagai hasil penelitian nasional dan internasional yang relevan dalam rentang tahun 2015-2024. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa model SUDIANG berakar pada teori konstruktivisme sosial dan pembelajaran reflektif yang menekankan keterlibatan aktif peserta didik melalui kegiatan meringkas, berdiskusi, menganalisis, dan menerapkan konsep Biologi secara nyata. Setiap tahap berkontribusi terhadap penguatan aspek kognitif, metakognitif, dan afektif peserta didik, sehingga mendukung pengembangan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi (HOTS), kolaborasi ilmiah, dan literasi sains. Model ini juga relevan dengan orientasi Kurikulum Merdeka yang menekankan pembelajaran kontekstual dan berbasis proyek. Dengan demikian, SUDIANG dapat menjadi model pembelajaran reflektif yang komprehensif dan adaptif terhadap tuntutan abad ke-21, khususnya dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan penerapan konsep Biologi dalam kehidupan nyata.
Downloads
References
Afandi, M., Chamalah, E., Wardani, O. P., & Gunarto, H. (2013). Model dan Metode Pembelajaran. Semarang: Unissula Press
Alfian, S. Y. (2014). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Meringkas dan Format Presentasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Penalaran Argumentatif Sejarah di SMA. Edusentris, 5(1), 49-65. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/edusentris/article/view/73786
Amalia, N. (2022). Penerapan Model Contextual Teaching and Learning untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Biologi Siswa. Biocaster: Jurnal Kajian Biologi, 2(4), 219-229. https://e-journal.lp3kamandanu.com/index.php/biocaster/article/view/392/427
Ananta, A. S., Azis, Z., & Amri, Z. (2023). Pengaruh Free Discovery Learning dan Collaborative Inquiry pada Berpikir Kritis dan Kolaborasi Siswa. Gammath: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 64-73. https://ejurnal.unmuhjember.ac.id/index.php/JPM/article/view/333/183
Astawa, I. M. W., Sadia, I. W., & Suastra, I. W. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis proyek terhadap sikap ilmiah dan konsep diri siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 5(2). https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/1510
Astika, I. K. U., Suma, K., & Suastra, I. W. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis masalah (problem based learning) terhadap sikap ilmiah dan ketrampilan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 3(1). https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/851
Babullah, R., Qomariyah, S., Neneng, N., Natadireja, U., & Nurafifah, S. (2024). Kolaborasi metode diskusi kelompok dengan problem solving learning untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemecahan masalah siswa pada materi aqidah akhlak. Jurnal Budi Pekerti Agama Islam, 2(2), 65-84. https://journal.aripafi.or.id/index.php/jbpai/article/view/132/175
Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. John Wiley & Sons.
Chi, Xiaobo (2023). The influence of presence types on learning engagement in a MOOC: The role of autonomous motivation and grit. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 5169–5181. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S442794
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Fink, A. (2020). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fithriyah, N. N., & Isma, U. (2024). Analisis keterampilan berfikir kritis dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 2(2), 225-235. https://journal.unusida.ac.id/index.php/jmi/id/article/view/1321/849
Iswara, D. M. & Bayhaqi A. P. (2024). Metode Pembelajaran yang Sesuai untuk Peserta Didik. Karimah Tauhid, 3(5), 5984–6013. https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i5.13270
Joyce, B., Calhoun, E., (2025). Models of teaching. Tenth Edition. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). New York : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781040003329_A47838819/preview-9781040003329_A47838819.pdf
Kemendikbud. (2022). Panduan Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Pearson Education.
Kusuma, A. S., & Baskara, Z. W. (2023). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Reading Questioning and Answering (RQA) Terintegrasi Mind Mapping Terhadap Kterampilan Metakognitif dan Retensi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(1b), 929-938. https://jipp.unram.ac.id/index.php/jipp/article/view/1312
Le, H. V. dan Nguyen, L. Q., (2024). Promoting L2 learners' critical thinking skills: The role of constructivist approaches. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1241973. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1241973/full
Mahmud, S., Nusantari, E., Lamondo, D., Yusuf, F. M., Ibrahim, M., & Mustaqimah, N. (2025). Pengembangan e-modul Biologi pada materi sistem ekskresi untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Unnes Science Education Journal. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/biodik/article/download/40944/20402/128949
McCarthy, N., Neville, K., & Pope, A. (2025). Feedback and formative assessment—looking backwards to move forward. Discover Education, 4(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00414-9
Mustika, M., Maknun, J., & Feranie, S. (2019). Case study: Analysis of senior high school students’ scientific creative, critical thinking and its correlation with their scientific reasoning skills on the sound concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 032057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032057
Oyler, D. R. (2014). Revisiting the Socratic method as a tool for teaching critical thinking. Journal of Learning in Health Professions, 33(1), 27–34. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174386/
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Rowman & Littlefield.
Priyamvada. (2018). Exploring the constructivist approach in education: Theory, practice, and implications. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(2), 716–725. https://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR19D5140.pdf
Rais, M., & Aryani, F. (2019). Pembelajaran Reflektif: Seni Berpikir Kritis, Analitis, dan Kreatif. Badan Penerbit UNM. https://eprints.unm.ac.id/26676/5/1%20Buku%20Referensi%20Pembelajaran%20Reflektif-Ref.pdf
Rose, C., & Nicholl, M. J. (2023). Revolusi belajar accelerated learning for the 21st century. Nuansa Cendekia.
Sahamid, H. (2016). Developing critical thinking through Socratic questioning: An action research. International Education Studies, 9(6), 33–46. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1149230.pdf
Shaheen, L., & Mahmood, N. (2024). Correlation between Socratic questioning and development of critical thinking skills in secondary level science students. International Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Learning (IJITL), 10(2), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.35993/ijitl.v10i2.3297
Sholihah, M., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2016). Memberdayakan keterampilan metakognitif dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa dengan model pembelajaran reading concept map-reciprocal teaching (remap rt). Doctoral dissertation, State University of Malang https://www.academia.edu/download/101595751/2643.pdf
Sipahutar, A. P. A., Khairuna, K., & Rambe, R. N. (2024). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Diskusi Kelas Berbasis HOTS terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Kelas XI Materi Sistem Ekskresi. JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 4(2), 280-286. https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v4i2.584
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Solis Trujillo, B. P., Velarde-Camaqui, D., Gonzales Nuñez, C. A., Castillo Silva, E. V., & Gonzalez Said de la Oliva, M. D. P. (2025, May). The current landscape of formative assessment and feedback in graduate studies: a systematic literature review. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1509983). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1509983
Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 20(2), fe3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289
Supratman, S., Suhirman, S., Rusdianto, R., & Alhafizin, M. (2025). Integrasi Pendidikan Lingkungan dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Sekolah Menengah: Sebuah Kajian Literatur Menuju Kesadaran Ekologis Siswa. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 13(3), 1743-1754. https://e-journal3.undikma.ac.id/index.php/bioscientist/article/view/17001/7618
Syarah, M. M. (2021). Analisis penerapan pendekatan STEM pada pembelajaran biologi. Bio-Edu, 6(3), 236-243. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/380066-none-904b0c33.pdf
Taqiya, R. I., Shaumi, N. M., Al Zenyta, N. F., Fitri, M. A., & Suryanda, A. (2024). Efektivitas Model Project-Based Learning (PjBL) dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(2), 168-173.https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/inkuiri/article/view/82038/47097
Trisiana, A., Sugiaryo, S., & Rispantyo, R. (2019). Model desain Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di era media digital sebagai pendukung implementasi pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 16(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v16i2.24743
Ucan, S., & Webb, M. (2015). Social regulation of learning during collaborative inquiry learning in science: How does it emerge and what are its functions?. International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2503-2532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1083634
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Widiastuti, W., & Kania, W. (2021). Penerapan metode diskusi untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir kritis dan pemecahan masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Indonesia, 3(2), 259-264. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JPEI/article/view/50746/20746
Zubaidah, S. (2018). Mengenal 4C: Learning and innovation skills untuk menghadapi era revolusi industri 4.0. Universitas Negeri Malang Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bimarto Bora, Muhiddin Palennari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
