ANALISIS KECERDASAN SPASIAL DAN KEMAMPUAN MEMBACA WIRING DIAGRAM KELISTRIKAN OTOMOTIF PADA SISWA SMK NEGERI 3 TUBAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/edutech.v6i4.16130Keywords:
Kecerdasan Spasial, Wiring Diagram, Kelistrikan Otomotif, Teknik Kendaraan Ringan, Pendidikan VokasiAbstract
The ability to read wiring diagrams is an essential competence in automotive electrical learning because students must identify symbols, trace electrical circuits, understand component relationships, and interpret electrical systems represented diagrammatically. Theoretically, these activities are associated with spatial intelligence, which enables individuals to understand, visualize, and mentally manipulate visual representations. This study examined the association between spatial intelligence and automotive electrical wiring diagram reading performance among Light Vehicle Engineering students at SMK Negeri 3 Tuban. A quantitative correlational design was employed using 64 complete pairs of scores from an initial dataset of 70 students. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk test, Spearman rank correlation as the primary analysis, and Pearson correlation and simple linear regression as supplementary analyses. The mean spatial intelligence score was 72,40 (SD = 18,12), while the mean wiring diagram reading score was 91,03 (SD = 13,49). Both score distributions deviated from normality. Spearman correlation was very weak, negative, and non-significant (ρ = −0,119; p = 0,349), whereas Pearson correlation was very weak, positive, and non-significant (r = 0,132; p = 0,298). Despite their opposite directions, neither coefficient provided evidence of a statistically significant association. The regression model yielded R² = 0,017. Twenty-four students (37,5%) attained the maximum wiring diagram score, indicating upper-end score clustering; however, a measurement ceiling effect cannot be established without item-level evidence. The findings support integrating diagram interpretation with electrical knowledge, circuit tracing, and diagnostic practice.
Downloads
References
Akku?, ?., & Yüksel Arslan, P. (2022). The effects of augmented reality in the technical drawing course on engineering students’ spatial ability and academic achievement. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1020075
Awuor, N. O., Weng, C., Matere, I. M., Chen, J.-H., Puspitasari, D., & Tran, K. N. P. (2024). The effect of 3D-stereogram mobile AR on engineering drawing course outcomes among first-year vocational high schoolers with different spatial abilities: A Bloom’s taxonomy perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(6), 2725–2743. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2158477
Baptista, M., & Martins, I. (2023). Effect of a STEM approach on students’ cognitive structures about electrical circuits. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00393-5
Bauman, L. C., Hansen, B., Goodhew, L. M., & Robertson, A. D. (2024). Student conceptual resources for understanding electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(2), 020128. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.020128
Belk, C. H., & Orr, M. K. (2021). Work in progress: Review of working memory, spatial ability, and spatial anxiety in engineering problem-solving. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--38195
del Cerro Velázquez, F., & Morales Méndez, G. (2021). Systematic review of the development of spatial intelligence through augmented reality in STEM knowledge areas. Mathematics, 9(23), 3067. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9233067
Duffy, G., Sorby, S., & Bowe, B. (2020). An investigation of the role of spatial ability in representing and solving word problems among engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20349
Fauzan, G. H., Hamidah, I., & Sriyono. (2019). Penggunaan aplikasi berbasis Android untuk meningkatkan kemampuan membaca diagram kelistrikan bodi kendaraan pada peserta didik SMK. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 6(2), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.17509/jmee.v6i2.21802
Gittinger, M., & Wiesche, D. (2024). Systematic review of spatial abilities and virtual reality: The role of interaction. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 919–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20568
Liu, Z., Pan, S., Zhang, X., & Bao, L. (2022). Assessment of knowledge integration in student learning of simple electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), 020102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020102
McLaughlin, J. A., & Bailey, J. M. (2023). Students need more practice with spatial thinking in geoscience education: A systematic review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 147–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2029305
Mubarak, I., Warju, W., Danur Isnantyo, F., Nurtanto, M., Rahman, R. A., & Suyitno, S. (2020). Enhancing the learning outcomes of automotive electrical wiring diagram through Android simulation: A conceptual design for automotive vocational school. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 10694–10705. https://doi.org/10.61841/s4dqzz97
Papakostas, C., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2021). Exploration of augmented reality in spatial abilities training: A systematic literature review for the last decade. Informatics in Education, 20(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2021.06
Peppler, K. A., Sedas, R. M., & Thompson, N. (2023). Paper circuits vs. breadboards: Materializing learners’ powerful ideas around circuitry and layout design. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10029-0
Schenck, K. E., & Nathan, M. J. (2024). Navigating spatial ability for mathematics education: A review and roadmap. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09935-5
Staus, N. L., O’Connell, K., & Storksdieck, M. (2021). Addressing the ceiling effect when assessing STEM out-of-school time experiences. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 690431. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.690431
Susac, A., Planinic, M., Bubic, A., Jelicic, K., & Palmovic, M. (2023). Effect of representation format on conceptual question performance and eye-tracking measures. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020114
Taylor, H. A., Burte, H., & Renshaw, K. T. (2023). Connecting spatial thinking to STEM learning through visualizations. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2, 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00224-6
Tiwari, A. S., Bhagat, K. K., & Lampropoulos, G. (2024). Designing and evaluating an augmented reality system for an engineering drawing course. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00289-z
Yusuf, Y., & Nabila, I. (2024). Analysis of mathematical spatial abilities of vocational school students in solving transformation geometry problems. Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 14(2), 272–293. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2024.14.2.25264
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 EDUTECH : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Berbantuan Teknologi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.















