FENOMENA RESEARCH GAP DALAM PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW TERHADAP PUBLIKASI TAHUN 2021–2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/educational.v6i3.12079Keywords:
Research Gap, Research Methodology, Islamic Religious Education, Library Research, Scientific PublicationsAbstract
The development of Islamic Religious Education (IRE) research has increased significantly in recent years in terms of both publication quantity and thematic diversity. However, this growth has not been accompanied by sufficient methodological diversity, creating potential research gaps that may hinder the comprehensive advancement of the field. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of research gaps in Islamic Religious Education research through a methodological review of publications published between 2021 and 2025. The study employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach by analyzing 30 articles retrieved from Google Scholar, SINTA, and Scopus databases based on predetermined inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed using content analysis to identify trends in research approaches, research designs, data collection techniques, and dominant research themes. The findings indicate that Islamic Religious Education research is still predominantly characterized by qualitative approaches, particularly library research and case studies, whereas quantitative methods, mixed methods, experimental research, and digital data-based approaches remain relatively underutilized. Furthermore, recurring themes were identified in learning, character education, and digital literacy, while methodological studies, program evaluation, and innovative research designs have received comparatively limited attention. These findings reveal the existence of methodological gaps that require greater attention to enhance the quality, diversity, and scholarly contribution of Islamic Religious Education research. Therefore, strengthening methodological competencies among researchers and promoting methodological diversification are essential for fostering more innovative and impactful research in the field.
ABSTRAK
Perkembangan penelitian Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) dalam beberapa tahun terakhir menunjukkan peningkatan yang signifikan baik dari segi kuantitas maupun keragaman tema kajian. Namun, peningkatan jumlah publikasi tersebut belum sepenuhnya diikuti oleh keberagaman metodologi penelitian sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan research gap yang memengaruhi perkembangan keilmuan PAI. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis fenomena research gap dalam penelitian Pendidikan Agama Islam melalui kajian metodologis terhadap publikasi ilmiah tahun 2021–2025. Penelitian menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review dengan menganalisis 30 artikel yang diperoleh dari basis data Google Scholar, SINTA, dan Scopus berdasarkan kriteria inklusi yang telah ditetapkan. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik content analysis untuk mengidentifikasi kecenderungan pendekatan, desain, teknik pengumpulan data, serta tema penelitian yang dominan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penelitian PAI masih didominasi oleh pendekatan kualitatif, khususnya studi kepustakaan dan studi kasus, sementara penggunaan metode kuantitatif, mixed methods, penelitian eksperimen, dan pendekatan berbasis data digital masih relatif terbatas. Selain itu, ditemukan pengulangan tema pada aspek pembelajaran, pendidikan karakter, dan literasi digital, sedangkan kajian metodologis, evaluasi program, dan inovasi desain penelitian masih kurang mendapat perhatian. Temuan ini menunjukkan adanya kesenjjangan metodologis yang perlu diatasi melalui penguatan kompetensi penelitian dan diversifikasi pendekatan metodologis guna meningkatkan kualitas penelitian Pendidikan Agama Islam.
Downloads
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association. https://apastyle.apa.org/products/publication-manual-7th-edition
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2021). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2021). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., Conboy, K., Doyle, R., Dubey, R., Dutot, V., Felix, R., Goyal, D. P., Gustafsson, A., Hinsch, C., Jebabli, I., ... Wamba, S. F. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2022). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082144
Fink, A. (2020). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Guetterman, T. C., & Creswell, J. W. (2023). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (7th ed.). Pearson.
Hilmy, M. (2021). The quest for Indonesian Muslim identity: Islam, moderation, and education. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 15(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2021.15.1.1-25
Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
Nurdin, A., Hendra, Khozin, Haris, A., Zainab, N., & Yahaya, M. Z. (2024). Developing the Islamic Religious Education curriculum in inclusive schools or madrasah and its implementation: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.6907
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Vears, D. F., & Gillam, L. (2022). Inductive content analysis: A guide for beginning qualitative researchers. Focus on Health Professional Education, 23(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v23i1.544
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2020). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 40(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2020). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(39). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 EDUCATIONAL : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan & Pengajaran

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.















