PENGEMBANGAN E-MODUL BERBASIS PEMBELAJARAN INTERAKTIF TERINTEGRASI KETERAMPILAN ABAD 21 UNTUK MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINS SISWA SMA PADA MATERI EKOSISTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/secondary.v6i4.15194Abstract
The low level of scientific literacy and the suboptimal integration of 21st-century skills in Biology learning highlight the need for innovative and interactive digital learning media. This study aimed to develop an interactive learning-based e-module integrated with 21st-century skills (4C: Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication, and Collaboration), evaluate its validity and practicality, and analyze its effectiveness in improving senior high school students' scientific literacy on ecosystem topics. The study was conducted from January to May 2026 using a Research and Development (R&D) approach with the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). Product effectiveness was evaluated using a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group design. The participants comprised 160 tenth-grade students from SMAN 1 Kasokandel and SMA Islam Al Mizan, Majalengka Regency, with 40 students in the experimental class and 40 students in the control class at each school. Data were collected through expert validation sheets, student response questionnaires, learning implementation observation sheets, and scientific literacy tests, and were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and the Mann-Whitney U Test. The results showed that the e-module achieved a very high validity level, with an average feasibility percentage of 92.9%, comprising 93.7% from material experts, 87.5% from media experts, and 97.7% from Biology learning experts. The e-module was also considered highly practical, as indicated by a 100% positive response across all questionnaire items. The effectiveness test demonstrated a significant improvement in scientific literacy among students in the experimental classes at both schools (Asymp. Sig. = 0.000 < 0.05). The experimental classes achieved N-Gain scores of 0.73, categorized as high, at SMA Islam Al Mizan and 0.68, categorized as moderate, at SMAN 1 Kasokandel, exceeding the control classes' scores of 0.33 and 0.19, respectively. Therefore, the interactive e-module integrated with 4C skills is valid, practical, and effective in supporting the improvement of senior high school students' scientific literacy on ecosystem topics.
ABSTRAK
Rendahnya literasi sains serta belum optimalnya integrasi keterampilan abad ke-21 dalam pembelajaran Biologi menuntut pengembangan media pembelajaran digital yang interaktif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan e-modul berbasis pembelajaran interaktif yang terintegrasi keterampilan abad ke-21 (4C: Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication, dan Collaboration), menguji validitas dan kepraktisannya, serta menganalisis efektivitasnya dalam meningkatkan literasi sains siswa SMA pada materi ekosistem. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada Januari–Mei 2026 menggunakan metode Research and Development (R&D) dengan model ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). Efektivitas produk diuji menggunakan quasi-experimental design dengan pola pretest-posttest control group design. Subjek penelitian melibatkan 160 siswa kelas X dari SMAN 1 Kasokandel dan SMA Islam Al Mizan Kabupaten Majalengka, masing-masing terdiri atas 40 siswa kelas eksperimen dan 40 siswa kelas kontrol. Data dikumpulkan melalui lembar validasi ahli, angket respons siswa, lembar observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran, dan tes literasi sains, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test dan Mann-Whitney U Test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa e-modul memiliki tingkat validitas sangat tinggi dengan rata-rata persentase kelayakan 92,9%, yang meliputi penilaian ahli materi sebesar 93,7%, ahli media sebesar 87,5%, dan ahli pembelajaran Biologi sebesar 97,7%. E-modul juga dinyatakan sangat praktis berdasarkan respons positif siswa sebesar 100% pada seluruh butir angket. Hasil uji efektivitas menunjukkan adanya peningkatan literasi sains yang signifikan pada kelas eksperimen di kedua sekolah (Asymp. Sig. = 0,000 < 0,05). Nilai N-Gain kelas eksperimen mencapai 0,73 dengan kategori tinggi di SMA Islam Al Mizan dan 0,68 dengan kategori sedang di SMAN 1 Kasokandel, lebih tinggi dibandingkan kelas kontrol yang masing-masing memperoleh 0,33 dan 0,19. Dengan demikian, e-modul interaktif terintegrasi keterampilan 4C dinyatakan valid, praktis, dan efektif untuk mendukung peningkatan literasi sains siswa SMA pada materi ekosistem.
Downloads
References
Anggraeni, D. M., Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Shofiyah, N., & Jatmiko, B. (2023). Systematic review of problem-based learning research in fostering critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, Article 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101334
Arsyad, A. (2017). Media pembelajaran. Rajawali Pers.
Bybee, R. W. (2015). The STEM shift: Reform or reality? NSTA Press.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674030107
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). HarperCollins College Publishers.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois.
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
Fitriani, N. (2022). Pengaruh pembelajaran discovery learning terhadap literasi sains pada materi ekosistem siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi.
Glick, M., Greenberg, M. S., Lockhart, P. B., & Challacombe, S. J. (2021). Burket’s oral medicine (13th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Green, A. E., Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., & Kaufman, J. C. (2024). The process definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 36(3), 544–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573
Hindriana, A. F., Turki, H. I., Prihatin, Y., Setiawati, I., Abidin, Z., & Pratami, A. R. (2026). Cognitive load management: Learning abstract and complex scientific concepts using visual metaphors and metonymies. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 45(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v45i1.83196
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Kain, C., Koschmieder, C., Matischek-Jauk, M., & Bergner, S. (2024). Mapping the landscape: A scoping review of 21st century skills literature in secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 151, Article 104739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104739
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 56/M/2022 tentang pedoman penerapan kurikulum dalam rangka pemulihan pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Khishfe, R. (2023). Improving students' conceptions of nature of science: A review of the literature. Science & Education, 32, 1887–1931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00390-8
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
Nedungadi, P. P., Raman, R., & McGregor, M. (2021). Personalized learning in schools: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 1200–1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10003-2
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023a). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023b). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Reski, S. H., & Fadilah, M. (2024). Analisis media pembelajaran terhadap beban kognitif peserta didik pada pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Bioshell: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, Biologi, dan Pendidikan IPA, 13(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.56013/bio.v13i1.2773
Sari, R. P., Syamsurizal, S., & Ramli, R. (2021). Development of e-modules based on scientific literacy for biology learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1940(1), Article 012117. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1940/1/012117
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: A new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
Slavin, R. E. (2019). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson.
Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
Uslan. (2024). The effectiveness of module to improve scientific literacy. JKPI: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2). https://journal.uniga.ac.id/index.php/jkpi
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 SECONDARY: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Menengah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
