FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI TINGKAT UPAH PEKERJA GENERASI MILENIAL DAN GENERASI Z DI KOTA MATARAM NUSA TENGGARA BARAT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/moneter.v3i1.16330Keywords:
Upah, Generasi Milenial & Generasi Z, Jenis Pekerjaan, Jaminan Sosial, Jam Kerja, PelatihanAbstract
ABSTRACT
The proportion of Millennial and Generation Z workers in Mataram City’s labor force increased from 57.37% in 2021 to 59.45% in 2024, representing a rise of 2.08 percentage points. This study aims to analyze the effects of job type, social security, working hours, and training on the wage levels of Millennial and Generation Z workers in Mataram City. The study employed an associative quantitative approach using primary data collected through questionnaires from 100 respondents selected through purposive sampling. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with EViews 13. The results indicate that job type, working hours, and training have positive and significant effects on wage levels. Formal-sector workers and those who participate in training tend to earn higher wages, while longer working hours are associated with higher wages. In contrast, social security has a negative and significant association with cash wages. The four variables jointly have a significant effect on wage levels. These findings suggest that job characteristics and skills development are associated with wage differences among Millennial and Generation Z workers.
ABSTRAK
Struktur angkatan kerja di Kota Mataram semakin didominasi oleh generasi milenial dan Generasi Z, dengan proporsi meningkat dari 57,37% pada 2021 menjadi 59,45% pada 2024, atau naik 2,08 poin persentase. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh jenis pekerjaan, jaminan sosial, jam kerja, dan pelatihan terhadap tingkat upah pekerja milenial dan Generasi Z di Kota Mataram. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif asosiatif dengan data primer yang dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dari 100 responden yang dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Data dianalisis menggunakan regresi linier berganda dengan bantuan EViews 13. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa jenis pekerjaan, jam kerja, dan pelatihan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap tingkat upah. Pekerja sektor formal dan pekerja yang mengikuti pelatihan cenderung memperoleh upah lebih tinggi, sedangkan penambahan jam kerja berkaitan dengan peningkatan upah. Sebaliknya, jaminan sosial berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap upah tunai. Secara simultan, keempat variabel berpengaruh signifikan terhadap tingkat upah. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa karakteristik pekerjaan dan pengembangan keterampilan berkaitan dengan variasi upah pekerja kedua generasi tersebut.
References
Arntz, M., Ben Yahmed, S., & Berlingieri, F. (2022). Working from home, hours worked and wages: Heterogeneity by gender and parenthood. Labour Economics, 76, Article 102169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102169
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Mataram. (2025). Publikasi - Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Mataram
Card, D., Rothstein, J., & Yi, M. (2024). Industry wage differentials: A firm-based approach. Journal of Labor Economics, 42(S1), S11–S59. https://doi.org/10.1086/728803
Ginting, C. Y., Elfindri, & Kamarni, N. (2024). Qualification mismatch dan dampaknya terhadap upah pekerja di Indonesia: Heckman two step method. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 21(2). https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/JIEB/article/view/22668
Grimes, P. W., Lopus, J. S., & Amidjono, D. S. (2022). Financial life-skills training and labor market outcomes in Indonesia. International Review of Economics Education, 41, Article 100255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2022.100255
Harahap, E. F. (2024). Faktor-faktor yang menentukan tingkat upah di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Menara Ekonomi: Penelitian dan Kajian Ilmiah Bidang Ekonomi, 10(2), 45–56. https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/menaraekonomi/article/view/5298
Kurniawan, E. E., & Kristiyanto, S. (2024). How education creates your wages, a case of manufacturing and retail companies in Surabaya. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ekonomi-Manajemen-Akuntansi, 20(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.30742/equilibrium.v20i1.3634
Majo Saibah, B. R. A., & Salsabilla. (2026). Dampak sumber pendanaan pelatihan terhadap upah pekerja baru di Indonesia: Studi empiris dari Sakernas 2024. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v10i2.7747
Merdikawati, N., & Al Izzati, R. (2026). Minimum wage impacts on wages and employment across manufacturing establishments of different sizes in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 62(2), 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2026.2664402
Nopiah, R., Apriyanti, C., & Barika. (2026). Do workers with digital competencies earn higher wages? Evidence from the Indonesian labor market. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, 5(3), 576–596. https://e-journal.citakonsultindo.or.id/index.php/IJEBIR/article/view/3234
Puri, I. A. W. R. I., & Wicaksono, P. (2023). Pendidikan vokasi dan pengembalian upah. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v12i1.56689
Rahma, N., & Kirana, M. (2026). Analisis gender wage gap pada sektor formal dan informal di Indonesia: Studi data Sakernas 2023. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, 8(2), 127–139. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/dinamika_pembangunan/article/view/77107/0
Santoso, R. P., Sahadewo, G. A., Sugiyanto, C., & Setiastuti, S. U. (2022). Informal and formal wage differences based on cohorts in Indonesia. Economies, 10(12), Article 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10120317
Sen, K. (2024). Broken ladders? Labour market inequality in Indonesia and India. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 60(2), 161–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2024.2389593
Setiyaningsih, R., Panjawa, J., Laut, L. T., & Sugiharti, R. R. (2024). Qualification mismatch and labor wage implications. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 13(3), Article 11873. https://doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v13i3.11873
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Syahputra, M. H. M., Wijimulawiani, B. S., & Wafik, A. Z. (2025). Determinant tingkat upah di Indonesia: Wawasan dari Survei Kehidupan Keluarga Indonesia Gelombang 5. JPEK (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan), 9(3), 1104–1115. https://doi.org/10.29408/jpek.v9i3.32240
Wicaksono, P., Al Aufa, B., Susanna, N., & Aninditya, F. (2024). Skill formation and income: Insights from the Indonesian migrant workers. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, Article 101086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101086
Wihardja, M. M., & Pradana, A. T. (2024). Examining the drivers of changes in mean earnings and earnings inequality in Indonesia. Asian Economic Journal, 38(2), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12332
Yunisvita, Y., Teguh, M., Chodijah, R., Kurniawan, A., & Rahma, S. (2022). Determinants of premium and penalty of worker income in Indonesia. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 11(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v11i2.53225
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Baiq Annisa Novita, Tuty Handayani, Muhammad Dzul Fadlli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
