TRANSFORMASI ASESMEN MULTILITERASI: MENGUKUR CRITICAL THINKING DAN DIGITAL FLUENCY SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR DI ERA GENERATIVE AI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/edutech.v6i2.10888Keywords:
Asesmen Multiliterasi, Critical Thinking, Digital Fluency, Pseudo-Digital FluencyAbstract
The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) in elementary education has introduced the Pseudo-Digital Fluency phenomenon, a condition in which students appear technically proficient with digital tools but lack depth in critical thinking and information validation. This study aims to develop and validate a Multimodal-Based Multiliteracy Assessment Model capable of authentically measuring Critical Thinking and Digital Fluency among elementary school students in the Gen-AI era. This study employed a mixed methods approach integrating Research and Development (R&D) procedures using the ADDIE model with qualitative analysis. A limited field trial was conducted with 28 Phase B students (Grade 4) at SD Negeri 1 Sukosari in the 2025/2026 academic year. Content validity was assessed by two expert validators using Aiken's V index, while reliability was measured through inter-rater Percentage of Agreement. The results indicate that the developed assessment model achieved a highly feasible validity coefficient (Aiken's V = 0.89). Field trials revealed that students' ability to independently cross-check AI-generated information was the most critical weakness (71.50%), while their digital ethical resilience scored in the very high category (85.75%). The multimodal portfolio rubric demonstrated high reliability with an inter-rater agreement coefficient of 89.28%. As a transformative solution, this study produced the Digital Sandwich Strategy, integrating Scenario-Based Assessment, Digital Portfolio, and Metacognitive Reflection to ensure human reasoning remains central to the learning process amid advancing AI technology.
ABSTRAK
Munculnya Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) di lingkungan pendidikan dasar memunculkan fenomena Pseudo-Digital Fluency, yakni kondisi di mana siswa tampak mahir secara teknis dalam mengoperasikan alat digital, namun mengalami defisit dalam kemampuan berpikir kritis dan validasi informasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan dan menguji Model Asesmen Multiliterasi Berbasis Multimodal yang valid dan reliabel untuk mengukur Critical Thinking dan Digital Fluency siswa sekolah dasar secara autentik di era Gen-AI. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan mixed methods yang mengintegrasikan prosedur Research and Development (R&D) model ADDIE dengan analisis kualitatif. Uji coba terbatas dilakukan pada 28 siswa Fase B (Kelas 4) di SD Negeri 1 Sukosari tahun ajaran 2025/2026. Validitas isi instrumen diuji oleh dua pakar menggunakan indeks Aiken's V, sedangkan reliabilitas diukur melalui Percentage of Agreement antar-penilai. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model asesmen yang dikembangkan memperoleh koefisien validitas sangat layak (Aiken's V = 0,89). Uji coba lapangan mengungkap bahwa kemampuan validasi silang (cross-check) siswa terhadap luaran AI merupakan titik lemah yang paling kritis (71,50%), sementara ketahanan etis digital siswa berada pada kategori sangat tinggi (85,75%). Reliabilitas rubrik portofolio multimodal terbukti tinggi dengan koefisien kesepakatan antar-penilai sebesar 89,28%. Sebagai solusi transformatif, penelitian ini menghasilkan Strategi Digital Sandwich yang mengintegrasikan Scenario-Based Assessment, Digital Portfolio, dan Refleksi Metakognitif untuk memastikan nalar manusiawi tetap menjadi pusat proses belajar di tengah dominasi teknologi AI.
Downloads
References
Azmi, N. A., & Shahrill, M. (2023). Integrating digital instruments in primary school assessment using the ADDIE model framework. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(3), 1420–1431. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i3.22891
Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.
Buckingham, D. (2019). The media education manifesto. Polity Press.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2023a). A grammar of multimodal meaning-making. Routledge.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2023b). Multiliteracies: Shaping learning futures. Routledge.
Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students' perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2290342. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342
Dhahir, D. F., Kenda, N., & Dirgahayu, D. (2024). The relationship of digital literacy, exposure to AI-generated deepfake videos, and the ability to identify deepfakes in Generation X. Jurnal Pekommas, 9(2), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.56873/jpkm.v9i2.5873
Firdaus, J. A., Ummah, R. I., Aprialini, R. R., & Faizin, A. (2025). Ketergantungan penggunaan kecerdasan buatan (AI) pada tugas akademik mahasiswa terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 14(1), 1203–1214. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v14i1.27160
Floridi, L. (2024). The ethics of generative AI: Information fragment, deepfakes, and the erosion of digital trust. Philosophy & Technology, 37(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00712-w
Francis, N. J., Jones, S., & Smith, D. P. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Balancing innovation and integrity. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 81, 14048. https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048
Gartner. (2025). Hype cycle for artificial intelligence and generative AI, 2025: From inflated expectations to practical infrastructure. Gartner Research.
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2024). Literacy in the time of artificial intelligence [Preprint]. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/es5kb
Kofinas, A. K., et al. (2025). The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 2522–2549. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13585
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Cook, J., van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., & Oreskes, N. (2023). Misinformation and the epistemic integrity of democracy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 54, Article 101711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101711
Luckin, R. (2025a). AI and the future of assessment: Moving from product-oriented grading to process-oriented cognitive validation. Routledge.
Luckin, R. (2025b). AI and the future of education: Beyond the product-oriented assessment paradigm. Oxford University Press.
McGrew, S., & Breakstone, J. (2023). Civic online reasoning across the curriculum: Developing and testing the efficacy of digital literacy lessons. AERA Open, 9, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231176451
Mollick, E. (2024). Co-intelligence: Living and working with AI. Portfolio/Penguin.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian dan pengembangan (Research and Development/R&D) untuk bidang: Pendidikan, manajemen, sosial, teknik (3rd ed.). Alfabeta.
Thornhill-Miller, B., et al. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Veldhuis, A., Lo, P. Y., Kenny, S., & Antle, A. N. (2025). Critical Artificial Intelligence literacy: A scoping review and framework synthesis. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 43, 100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100708
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 EDUTECH : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Berbantuan Teknologi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.














