ANALISIS KEPUASAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP LAYANAN ADMINISTRASI PROGRAM STUDI: STUDI KASUS PROGRAM STUDI MANAJEMEN PERTANIAN LAHAN KERING

Authors

  • Esra Rombeallo Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Kupang
  • Risky Meyranti Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Kupang
  • Deborah Tirtania Chrisna Pake Seko Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Kupang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v6i2.9804

Keywords:

kepuasan mahasiswa, layanan administrasi, SERVQUAL

Abstract

Administrative service quality is a strategic component supporting the success of higher education. This study aims to analyze student satisfaction levels with administrative services at Dryland Agricultural Management Study Program, using a descriptive quantitative approach based on the SERVQUAL model. The data were collected through a structured 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, involving 32 active students as respondents, using total sampling. The instrument consisted of 10 items covering dimensions of service speed, ease of information access, staff friendliness, staff dedication, timeliness, ease of meeting staff, waiting duration, complaint handling, service consistency, and overall satisfaction. The overall mean satisfaction score was 4.42 out of 5 (Satisfied category). The highest aspects were staff dedication (M = 4.59) and staff friendliness (M = 4.53), both are in the Very Satisfied category, while the lowest were waiting duration satisfaction and complaint handling (M = 4.28). A total of 88.75% of all ratings fell in the Satisfied and Very Satisfied categories. These findings indicate that MPLK administrative services generally meet students’ expectations although improvement opportunities remain in the responsiveness dimension, particularly queue management and complaint handling mechanisms.

ABSTRAK
Kualitas layanan administrasi merupakan komponen strategis dalam mendukung keberhasilan penyelenggaraan pendidikan tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap layanan administrasi Program Studi Manajemen Pertanian Lahan Kering (MPLK) menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif berbasis model SERVQUAL. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui kuesioner terstruktur berskala Likert 5 poin yang melibatkan 32 mahasiswa aktif sebagai responden dengan metode total sampling. Instrumen terdiri dari 10 butir pertanyaan yang mencakup dimensi kecepatan pelayanan, kemudahan akses informasi, keramahan staf, kesungguhan staf, ketepatan waktu, kemudahan bertemu staf, waktu tunggu, penanganan keluhan, konsistensi layanan, dan kepuasan keseluruhan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan rata-rata keseluruhan kepuasan mahasiswa sebesar 4,42 dari skala 5 (kategori Puas). Aspek tertinggi adalah kesungguhan staf (M = 4,59) dan keramahan staf (M = 4,53), keduanya berkategori Sangat Puas. Aspek dengan nilai terendah adalah kepuasan terhadap waktu tunggu dan penanganan keluhan (M = 4,28). Sebesar 88,75% dari total penilaian berada pada kategori Puas dan Sangat Puas. Temuan ini mengindikasikan layanan administrasi Program Studi MPLK secara umum telah memenuhi ekspektasi mahasiswa, namun masih terdapat ruang perbaikan pada dimensi responsivitas, khususnya manajemen antrian dan mekanisme penanganan keluhan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeleke, B., Robertson-Andersson, D., & Moodley, G. (2021). Osmotic response of Dotilla fenestrata (sand bubbler crab) exposed to combined water acidity and varying metal (Cd and Pb). Heliyon, 7(4), e06763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06763

Alemu, A. (2023). Assessing service quality in tertiary education using adapted SERVQUAL scale. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2259733

Amoako, G. K., Ampong, G. O., Gabrah, A. Y. B., de Heer, F., & Antwi-Adjei, A. (2023). Service quality affecting student satisfaction in higher education institutions in Ghana. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2238468

Artino Jr, A. R., Chen, H. C., Santen, S. A., Simons, R. J., Christner, J. G., & Teherani, A. (2026). Overreliance on student satisfaction surveys in medical education: a call for reform in evaluation and accreditation practices. Academic Medicine, 101(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/acamed/wvaf002

Bahadur, S. G. C., Gurung, S. K., Poudel, R. L., Yadav, U. S., Bhattacharjee, A., & Dhungana, B. R. (2024). The effect of higher education service quality on satisfaction among business students in India and Nepal. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2393521

Bwachele, V. W., Chong, Y.-L., & Krishnapillai, G. (2023). Perceived service quality and student satisfaction in higher learning institutions in Tanzania. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 444. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01913-6

Camilleri, M. A. (2021). Evaluating service quality and performance of higher education institutions: A systematic review and a post-COVID-19 outlook. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 13(2), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2020-0034

Chali, G. T. (2026). Assessment of Service Quality and Student Satisfaction: The Case of Wallaga University, Ethiopia. Academic Review of Islamic Studies and Education (ARISE), 1(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.0000/qksep356

Feng, Z., Gao, Y., Song, J., & He, Q. (2025). An analysis of information disclosure in build–operate–transfer road projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 322(1), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.032

Grönroos, C. (2000). Service management and marketing: A customer relationship management approach (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Harahap, S. M., Milfayetti, S., & Mariani, M. (2025). Systematic literature review of academic service quality in higher education. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Innovation in Education, Science, and Culture (ICIESC 2024). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.17-9-2024.2352968

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.

Kurniasih, E. T., Wiarta, I., Hierdawaty, T., Amrizal, A., & Dani, R. (2022). Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap pelayanan biro administrasi akademik, kemahasiswaan dan sistem informasi (BAAKSI) Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi. Journal Development, 10(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.53978/jd.v10i1.191

Nofrida, E. R., & Najib, K. H. (2023). Analisis pengaruh kualitas layanan akademik terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar, Menengah dan Tinggi (JMP-DMT), 4(4). https://doi.org/10.30596/jmp-dmt.v4i4.16231

Nomleni, B. A., Walean, R. H., & Mandagi, D. W. (2026). The Mediating Role of Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Brand Image, Price, Service Quality, and Digital Marketing on Student Loyalty in Higher Education. Paradoks: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 9(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.57178/paradoks.v9i1.1978

Ologundudu, G. S., Dada, D. A., & Ihinmoyan, T. (2026). Customer Perception and Customer Satisfaction in The Hospitality Industry in Southwest Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis of Service Quality Dimensions. International Journal of Social Sciences, Language and Linguistics, 6(03), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijssll-06-03-05

Pratiwi, N. J., Purwati, A. A., Hamzah, M. L., & Nyoto, N. (2022). The effect of service quality and academic information systems quality on student’s satisfaction. International Journal of Economics Development Research (IJEDR), 3(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v3i1.400

Rizos, S., Sfakianaki, E., & Kakouris, A. (2022). Quality of administrative services in higher education. European Journal of Educational Management, 5(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.5.2.115

Sujianto, S., Mujiono, M., Suardika, I. B., & Indriani, S. (2023). Pengaruh kualitas layanan administrasi akademik tentang kepuasan mahasiswa. Jurnal Flywheel, 14(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.36040/flywheel.v14i1.6523

Suprihatin, S., & Sakiyem, S. (2023). Model-model quality manajemen pendidikan. An-Nidzam: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Studi Islam, 10(2), 138–160. https://doi.org/10.33507/an-nidzam.v10i2.1790

Susetyo, D. P., Pranajaya, E., Setiawan, T., & Suryana, A. (2022). Kualitas pelayanan akademik dan citra institusi sebagai determinan kepuasan mahasiswa. Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v1i4.1250

Wisenthige, K., Pathirana, U., Perera, B., Wijesinghe, K., & Wijethunga, A. (2026). Determinants of student satisfaction in private universities: examining the impact of academic staff quality. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 18(3), 802-814. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2023-0562

Yusuf, N., Niswatin, N., & Tuli, H. (2023). Kepuasan mahasiswa akuntansi dalam pelayanan akademik (Aplikasi metode IKM dan IPA). Jambura Accounting Review, 4(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.37905/jar.v4i1.69

Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (2003). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Rombeallo, E. ., Meyranti, R. ., & Tirtania Chrisna Pake Seko, D. . (2026). ANALISIS KEPUASAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP LAYANAN ADMINISTRASI PROGRAM STUDI: STUDI KASUS PROGRAM STUDI MANAJEMEN PERTANIAN LAHAN KERING. LEARNING : Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 1313-1323. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v6i2.9804

Issue

Section

Articles