A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF TIME PRESSURE EFFECTS ON ENGLISH WRITING ACCURACY AND COMPLEXITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/manajerial.v5i2.6609Keywords:
psikolinguistik, tekanan waktu, keakuratan, kompleksitas penulisanAbstract
This study investigates the psycholinguistic effects of time pressure on English writing performance, focusing specifically on writing accuracy and complexity among EFL learners. Writing in a second language involves complex cognitive processes, including working memory, lexical retrieval, and syntactic structuring, which may be disrupted under time constraints. The research aims to analyze how time pressure affects these two critical aspects of writing. A quasi-experimental within-subjects design was employed, involving 40 students of Mayjen Sungkono University. Each participant completed two narrative writing tasks: one under time pressure (15 minutes) and one without time limits. Writing accuracy was assessed through error analysis, while writing complexity was measured using syntactic complexity indices. The findings revealed that time pressure significantly reduced grammatical accuracy and syntactic complexity in students' writing. These results indicate a trade-off between speed and language quality under time constraints. The study concludes that time pressure limits cognitive resources for monitoring and complex sentence construction, highlighting the need for balanced instructional approaches in English writing classes.
ABSTRAK
Studi ini menyelidiki efek psikolinguistik dari tekanan waktu terhadap kinerja menulis dalam bahasa Inggris, dengan fokus khusus pada akurasi dan kompleksitas tulisan di kalangan pembelajar bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa asing (EFL). Menulis dalam bahasa kedua melibatkan proses kognitif yang kompleks, termasuk memori kerja, pengambilan kosakata, dan penyusunan sintaksis, yang dapat terganggu ketika terdapat batasan waktu. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana tekanan waktu memengaruhi dua aspek penting dalam menulis tersebut. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuasi-eksperimental, melibatkan 40 mahasiswa di Universitas Mayjen Sungkono. Setiap peserta diminta menyelesaikan dua tugas menulis narasi: satu di bawah tekanan waktu (15 menit) dan satu tanpa batasan waktu. Akurasi tulisan dianalisis melalui identifikasi kesalahan tata bahasa, sementara kompleksitas tulisan diukur menggunakan indeks kompleksitas sintaksis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tekanan waktu secara signifikan menurunkan akurasi tata bahasa dan kompleksitas sintaksis dalam tulisan mahasiswa. Temuan ini mengindikasikan adanya keterbatasan antara kecepatan dan kualitas bahasa ketika peserta dihadapkan pada batasan waktu. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa tekanan waktu membatasi sumber daya kognitif yang diperlukan untuk memantau kesalahan dan membangun struktur kalimat yang kompleks, sehingga menekankan pentingnya penerapan pendekatan pengajaran yang seimbang dalam pembelajaran menulis bahasa Inggris.
Downloads
References
Adnan, M. N., & Bhakti, C. P. (2025). Peran guru bimbingan dan konseling dalam mereduksi kecemasan karier yang dihadapi siswa di era digital. Learning: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 363. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v5i1.4557
Alshareef, N., et al. (2024). The role of emotions in academic performance of undergraduate medical students: A narrative review. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05894-1
Andriani, E. (2022). Scrutinizing grammatical challenges within Indonesian-developed mobile game: ‘Code Atma.’ LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 12(2), 307. https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v12i2.6629
Bambang, B., et al. (2024). Literatur review: Pengembangan media pembelajaran Spinning Wheel untuk meningkatkan capaian menulis naratif siswa kelas 4 SD. Learning: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(4), 1136. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v4i4.3760
Buitrago, A. G. (2017). Collaborative and self-directed learning strategies to promote fluent EFL speakers. English Language Teaching, 10(5), 139. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n5p139
Hardjito, K., et al. (2025). Pengaruh keterlibatan mahasiswa dalam pembuatan mading 3D terhadap keterampilan literasi. Learning: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 535. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v5i2.4862
Johnson, M. D., & Tabari A, M. (2025). Linguistic complexity in second language writing: Insight from studies on task planning. Language Teaching, 58(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000284
Kord, M. A. (2018). The effect of task complexity and strategic planning time on writing accuracy: A case study of undergraduate students at AMU. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.11
Lee, J. (2020). An error analysis of L2 writing: How does task complexity affect L2 errors? The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 17(3), 954. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.3.13.954
Manchón, R. M., et al. (2023). Working memory, L2 proficiency, and task complexity: Independent and interactive effects on L2 written performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(3), 737–764. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000141
Nawal, A. F. (2018). Cognitive load theory in the context of second language academic writing. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1513812
Rahmat, N. H. (2023). Reducing cognitive overload in online academic writing: A case study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i2/16365
Ramadilla, H. S., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence and linguistics: The synergy of English in science and technology. Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 5(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v5i1.4115
Rezaii, N. (2022). The syntax-lexicon tradeoff in writing. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.12485
Shadloo, F., et al. (2019). Exploring syntactic complexity and its relationship with writing quality in EFL argumentative essays. Topics in Linguistics, 20(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2019-0005
Sheptian, R., et al. (2025). Classical test theory analysis using Anates: A study of mathematics readiness test for elementary school students. Science: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 5(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i1.3863
Sun, P. P., & Yuan, R. (2018). Understanding collaborative language learning in novice-level foreign language classrooms: Perceptions of teachers and students. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1285790
Tabari A, M. (2016). The effects of planning time on complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexical variety in L2 descriptive writing. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0015-6
Tabari, M. A. (2017). Investigating the effects of planning time on the complexity of L2 argumentative writing. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 21(1), 1–25.
Williams, C., & Beam, S. (2019). Technology and writing: Review of research. Computers & Education, 128, 227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.024
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 MANAJERIAL : Jurnal Inovasi Manajemen dan Supervisi Pendidikan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












