TINJAUAN YURIDIS SENGKETA INFORMASI PUBLIK DALAM PERKARA PIDANA: STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 980/PID.B/2025/PN MDN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/knowledge.v5i4.8124Keywords:
Tinjauan Yuridis, Perkara Pidana, Putusan Nomor 980/Pid.B/2025/PN MdnAbstract
This research aims to analyze and examine the legal implications of public information disputes that lead to criminal proceedings, with a focus on Decision Number 980/Pid.B/2025/PN Mdn issued by the Medan District Court. The research method used is normative-empirical with a case study approach, analyzing primary data in the form of court decision documents and secondary data in the form of laws and regulations (especially Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Disclosure and the Criminal Code), as well as related legal literature. The results of the study show that Decision Number 980/Pid.B/2025/PN Mdn illustrates the tension in the implementation of the KIP Law, especially regarding the classification of excluded information and the application Criminal sanctions. Legally, this study found that there is potential for criminalization of authorities based on inconsistent interpretations of the concept of "exempt information," which risks hindering the implementation of the principle of information transparency.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengkaji secara yuridis implikasi sengketa informasi publik yang berujung pada proses perkara pidana, dengan fokus pada Putusan Nomor 980/Pid.B/2025/PN Mdn yang dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Medan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif-empiris dengan pendekatan studi kasus (case study approach), menganalisis data primer berupa dokumen putusan pengadilan dan data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan (terutama Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana), serta literatur hukum terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Nomor 980/Pid.B/2025/PN Mdn mengilustrasikan adanya ketegangan (tension) dalam implementasi UU KIP, terutama mengenai klasifikasi informasi yang dikecualikan (excluded information) dan penerapan sanksi pidana. Secara yuridis, studi ini menemukan bahwa terdapat potensi kriminalisasi terhadap pihak yang berwenang atas dasar penafsiran yang tidak seragam terhadap konsep "informasi yang dikecualikan", yang berisiko menghambat implementasi prinsip keterbukaan informasi.
Downloads
References
Abdurrachman, H., Hamzani, A. I., Sudewo, F. A., Aravik, H., & Khasanah, N. (2021). Application of ultimum remedium principles in progressive law perspective. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 1012. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.119
Alhakim, A. (2022). Urgensi perlindungan hukum terhadap jurnalis dari risiko kriminalisasi UU Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i1.89-106
Anwar, M. (2020). Holistic paradigm contradiction of the ultimate principle of remedium against the principle of legality in environmental criminal law enforcement. Administrative and Environmental Law Review, 1(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v1i1.2083
Arisanti, T., Budiyono, B., Syahputra, A., & Surono, A. (2025). The concept of restoring the rights of victims of mass fraud with justice. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 840. https://doi.org/10.64252/0377g274
Beremanda, L. P. O., Hafrida, H., & Siregar, E. (2023). Prinsip keadilan restoratif dalam penghentian penuntutan melalui kompensasi dan restitusi. Pampas Journal of Criminal Law, 4(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v4i2.26483
Chairunnisa, L., Habibi, F., & Berthanila, R. (2023). Implementasi kebijakan keterbukaan informasi publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara ASIAN (Asosiasi Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara), 11(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.47828/jianaasian.v11i2.158
Djaelani, A., & Kristiawanto. (2022). Penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif dalam perkara penyalahgunaan narkotika. Yustisia Merdeka: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 8(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v8i2.133
Harir, M., Sudarmanto, K., Junaidi, M., Arifin, Z., Soegianto, S., & Arifin, M. (2025). Konflik norma (antinomy normen) sita umum dengan sita pidana dalam pemberesan harta pailit. Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(2), 1107. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.11384
Hutapea, T. P. D., & Rahayu, S. (2021). Pemidanaan perkara kesusilaan dalam relevansinya sebagai perbuatan melanggar perintah dinas. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 10(3), 443. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.3.2021.443-462
Kerstholt, J. H., Keijser, B., Veldhuis, G. A., & Smits?Clijsen, E. M. (2024). Organized crime requires dynamic decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1205135
Krona, H., Anckarsäter, H., Nilsson, T., & Hofvander, B. (2021). Patterns of lifetime criminality in mentally disordered offenders – Findings from a nationally representative cohort. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 564171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.564171
Lazuardi, G. (2020). Pendekatan restorative justice dalam tindak pelaku penyebaran hoaks. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(9), 1301. https://doi.org/10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i09.p01
Marzuki, A. U. (2023). The criminal law system in Indonesia from the perspective of Pancasila. Journal of Social Research, 2(9), 3154. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i9.1345
Octavianus, M. T., Zulfa, E. A., & Aji, I. S. (2023). Analisis efektivitas penanggulangan tindak kejahatan jalanan di wilayah hukum Polres Tangerang Selatan. Cakrawala: Repositori IMWI, 6(1), 527. https://doi.org/10.52851/cakrawala.v6i1.156
Pan, Y. (2023). Comparative analysis on the improvement of aggravate punishment for recidivism in Malaysia. West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(4), 240. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.196
Perm?di, I. (2023). Konstitusionalitas keberadaan bank tanah dalam pengelolaan dan penguasaan atas tanah oleh negara. Jurnal USM Law Review, 6(1), 291. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6678
Pratama, E. P., & Susilowati, T. (2023). Application of law and criminal accountability against violent theft offenders. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 4(6), 573. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i06.831
Priyadi, R., & Fitriasih, S. (2023). Pemidanaan terhadap pelaku pengulangan tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Salam: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i, 10(3), 699. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v10i3.31810
Rabbani, R. F., & Suherman, S. (2023). Urgensi pengaturan confidentiality agreement sebagai optimalisasi perlindungan kerahasiaan informasi bernilai ekonomi. Jurnal USM Law Review, 6(3), 1020. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7830
Setyawan, B. (2021). The existence of Public Information Commission related to public information disclosure principles in improving public services by the state. Yuridika, 36(3), 545. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v36i3.30382
Sitepu, E. N., Philia, I. T., Simbolon, J. A., Saragih, J., Aulia, N., Purba, R. O., Situmeang, T. A., & Ramadhan, T. (2025). Tinjauan yuridis sengketa informasi publik dalam administrasi negara: Studi kasus putusan PTUN Nomor 410/G/KI/2024/PTUN.JKT. Journal of Administrative and Social Science, 6(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v6i1.1835
Wahanisa, R., Riyanto, B., Adiyatma, S. E., Nnawulezi, U., & Rouf, M. A. (2023). Achieving public information transparency in the dissemination of local regulations. Yuridika, 38(3), 635. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i3.48345
