DIFFERENTIATED WRITING INSTRUCTION BASED ON STUDENTS’ WRITING PROFICIENCY LEVELS

Authors

  • Sabilla Amelia Putri Universitas Islam Kadiri
  • Wildan Isna Asyhar sabillaameliap@student.uniska-kediri.ac.id
  • Kristanti Yuntoro Putri Universitas Islam Kadiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/educator.v6i3.14837

Keywords:

instruksi terdiferensiasi, pencapaian menulis, Pelajar EFL

Abstract

Mixed-ability EFL classrooms present a persistent instructional challenge, as heterogeneous writing proficiency levels among students are rarely addressed effectively through a one-size-fits-all approach. Empirical studies that specifically investigate the effect of Differentiated Instruction (DI) on EFL writing achievement across different proficiency levels remain limited, leaving a gap in writing pedagogy within junior high school contexts. This study aimed to examine the effect of process-based DI on the writing achievement of eighth-grade EFL students at SMP Islam Sultan Agung. A quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design was employed involving 50 students, consisting of an experimental group (n = 25) receiving process-differentiated instruction and a control group (n = 25) receiving conventional instruction. The intervention was conducted over three sessions focusing on recount text writing. Writing performance was assessed using the ACTFL Writing Proficiency Test (WPT) guidelines, and the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk normality test, Levene’s homogeneity test, and an independent-samples t-test. The findings revealed that both groups had comparable initial writing ability before the intervention. Following the treatment, the experimental group demonstrated higher writing achievement than the control group. These results indicate that process-based DI effectively enhances EFL students’ writing performance by accommodating diverse levels of learner readiness. However, the relatively small sample size and short intervention period limit the generalizability of the findings. Therefore, DI is recommended as an alternative instructional strategy for heterogeneous EFL classrooms, and further research is needed to explore its long-term impact across broader educational contexts.

ABSTRAK

Kelas EFL dengan kemampuan campuran menghadirkan tantangan instruksional yang terus-menerus, karena tingkat kemahiran menulis yang heterogen di antara siswa jarang dapat ditangani secara efektif melalui pendekatan satu ukuran untuk semua. Studi empiris yang secara khusus meneliti pengaruh Instruksi Diferensiasi (Differentiated Instruction / DI) terhadap pencapaian menulis EFL pada berbagai tingkat kemahiran masih terbatas, sehingga menyisakan kesenjangan dalam pedagogi menulis pada konteks sekolah menengah pertama. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh DI berbasis proses terhadap pencapaian menulis siswa EFL kelas VIII di SMP Islam Sultan Agung. Penelitian menggunakan desain kuasi-eksperimental nonequivalent control group yang melibatkan 50 siswa, terdiri atas kelompok eksperimen (n = 25) yang memperoleh pembelajaran terdiferensiasi berbasis proses dan kelompok kontrol (n = 25) yang memperoleh pembelajaran konvensional. Intervensi dilaksanakan selama tiga sesi pembelajaran menulis teks recount. Kemampuan menulis diukur menggunakan pedoman ACTFL Writing Proficiency Test (WPT), sedangkan data dianalisis melalui statistik deskriptif, uji normalitas Shapiro–Wilk, uji homogenitas Levene, dan independent-samples t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedua kelompok memiliki kemampuan awal yang relatif setara sebelum perlakuan diberikan. Setelah intervensi, kelompok eksperimen menunjukkan pencapaian menulis yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan kelompok kontrol. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa DI berbasis proses efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan menulis siswa EFL dengan mengakomodasi tingkat kesiapan belajar yang beragam. Meskipun demikian, keterbatasan jumlah sampel dan durasi intervensi yang relatif singkat membatasi generalisasi hasil penelitian. Oleh karena itu, DI direkomendasikan sebagai alternatif strategi pembelajaran untuk kelas EFL yang heterogen, dan penelitian lanjutan diperlukan untuk mengeksplorasi dampaknya dalam jangka panjang pada konteks yang lebih luas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Subaiei, M. S. (2017). Challenges in mixed-ability classes and strategies utilized by ELI teachers to cope with them. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n6p182

Altohami, W. M. A., Hashem, M. E., Omar, A., & Hussein, M. S. M. (2022). Technological affordances and teaching in EFL mixed-ability classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(3), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130346

Asyhar, W. I. (2026). Developing writing skills with constructive teaching. Diva Pustaka.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Elhadki, ?. (2024). ACTFL proficiency guidelines 2024. Dil E?itimi ve Ara?t?rmalar? Dergisi, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.1494854

Erlangga, B. S., Ifadah, M., & Semilla, J. R. B. (2025). Exploring the challenges of teaching writing in EFL classrooms: Perspectives from prospective teachers. Applied Research on English Education (AREE), 3(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.26714/aree.3.2.2025.74-85

Fajariyah, L. A., Retnawati, H., & Madya, S. (2023). Exploring students’ diversity in a differentiated classroom. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(2), 205–219. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/266942

Gheith, A. G., & Mehany, A. A. A. (2020). Using differentiated instruction for developing writing fluency. Online Submission. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED632209

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Putri, S. A., Mujiono, M., & Sulistyo, T. (2025). The effect of differentiated learning on EFL achievement: A meta-analysis. Premise: Journal of English Education, 14(3), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v14i3.12703

Sapkota, H. P. (2025). Differentiated instruction in EFL classrooms: A systematic review. Journal of Natural Language and Linguistics, 3(1), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.54536/jnll.v3i1.5775

Sholah, H. M., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2025). A systematic review on the implementation of differentiated instruction for teaching writing. International Journal of Current Educational Practices, 5(3). https://journal.payungi.org/index.php/ijcep

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sun, X., & Yusof, S. M. (2024). Implementation of and challenges in differentiated L2 language instruction: A systematic literature review (2014–2023). Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología – Serie de Conferencias, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024.1249

Susanti, A., Widiati, U., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). The effect of proficiency pairings on EFL students’ writing ability in genre-based approach context. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20439

Tajik, O., Noor, S., & Golzar, J. (2024). Investigating differentiated instruction and the contributing factors to cater EFL students’ needs at the collegial level. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00299-5

Taye, T., & Mengesha, M. (2024). Identifying and analyzing common English writing challenges among regular undergraduate students. Heliyon, 10(17), e36876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36876

Titus, A. (2025). Effects of differentiated instruction on students’ empowered learning skills. International Journal of Instruction, 18(3), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.1832a

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yotta, E. G. (2023). Accommodating students’ learning styles differences in English language classroom. Heliyon, 9(6), e17497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17497

Zakarneh, B., Al-Ramahi, N., & Mahmoud, M. (2020). Challenges of teaching English language classes of slow and fast learners in the United Arab Emirates universities. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p256

Zhou, Y., Cai, T., Wang, D., & Li, F. (2023). Classroom compositional effects on low-ability students’ achievement in China. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(2), 788–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22939

Downloads

Published

2026-08-19

How to Cite

Putri, S. A., Asyhar, W. I., & Putri, K. Y. (2026). DIFFERENTIATED WRITING INSTRUCTION BASED ON STUDENTS’ WRITING PROFICIENCY LEVELS . EDUCATOR : Jurnal Inovasi Tenaga Pendidik Dan Kependidikan, 6(3), 522–528. https://doi.org/10.51878/educator.v6i3.14837

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.