RELASI ONTOLOGIS BAHASA DAN SAINS: QUO VADIS FILSAFAT ILMU DI ERA DISRUPSI ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Authors

  • Yudhi Hertanto Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/educational.v6i1.8416

Keywords:

Filsafat Ilmu, Terminologi, Global Boiling, Artificial Intelligence, Epistemologi

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the dialectical relationship between language and science in the midst of digital technological disruption, particularly the rapid development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). In science, language functions not only as a means of communication but also as an ontological foundation that shapes the reality and validity of scientific knowledge. This research employs a qualitative approach through library research and philosophical hermeneutic analysis of literature in the philosophy of science, philosophy of language, and contemporary studies on AI. The analysis focuses on the role of terminology in the construction of knowledge, the demarcation between natural sciences (Naturwissenschaften) and social sciences and humanities (Geisteswissenschaften), and the future direction of the philosophy of science in responding to epistemic challenges in the AI era. The findings indicate that the stability of scientific terminology is experiencing a crisis due to AI hallucinations and paper mill practices that produce fake scientific works. At the same time, there is a shift in language games from descriptive to performative functions, as reflected in the use of the term “Global Boiling.” This study concludes that an adaptive epistemology is necessary to safeguard the integrity and validity of scientific knowledge in the algorithmic era.

ABSTRAK

Kajian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi relasi dialektis antara bahasa dan ilmu pengetahuan di tengah disrupsi teknologi digital, khususnya perkembangan Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). Bahasa dalam sains tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai alat komunikasi, tetapi juga sebagai fondasi ontologis yang membentuk realitas dan validitas pengetahuan ilmiah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi kepustakaan dan analisis hermeneutika filosofis terhadap literatur filsafat ilmu, filsafat bahasa, serta kajian mutakhir tentang AI. Fokus kajian meliputi peran terminologi dalam konstruksi pengetahuan, demarkasi antara ilmu alam (Naturwissenschaften) dan ilmu sosial-humaniora (Geisteswissenschaften), serta arah masa depan filsafat ilmu dalam merespons tantangan epistemik era AI. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa stabilitas terminologi ilmiah mengalami krisis akibat fenomena halusinasi AI dan praktik paper mills yang memproduksi karya ilmiah palsu. Di sisi lain, terjadi pergeseran permainan bahasa dari fungsi deskriptif ke performatif, sebagaimana tercermin dalam istilah “Global Boiling”. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan perlunya epistemologi adaptif guna menjaga integritas dan validitas ilmu pengetahuan di era algoritmik.

References

Amelia, D., Putri, Y. R., & Daulay, I. S. (2024). Analisis Perkembangan Bahasa Indonesia di Era Digital: Tantangan dan Peluang. Fonologi: Jurnal Ilmuan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris, 2(4), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v2i4.1235

Castellví, M. T. C. (2003). Theories of terminology: Their description, prescription and explanation. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication, 9(2), 163-199. https://doi.org/10.1075/term.9.2.03cab

Dedes, K., Wibawa, A., & Budiarto, L. (2021). Sistematika filsafat menurut ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi dalam artificial intelligence. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Dan Edukasi Teknik, 1(8), 584-591. https://doi.org/10.17977/um068v1i82021p584-591

Dewi, A. P., Enjelika, E., & Winarno, A. (2024). Ontologi Sains Modern: Fondasi Filsafat Di Balik Pengetahuan Ilmiah. Jurnal Bintang Manajemen, 2(4), 122-133. https://doi.org/10.55606/jubima.v2i4.3427

Douven, I. (2025). Social learning in neural agent-based models. Philosophy of Science, 92(1), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2024.33

Endraswara, S. (2021). Filsafat Ilmu. Media Pressindo.

Fazi, M. B. (2024). The Computational Search for Unity: Synthesis in Generative AI. Journal of Continental Philosophy, 2(1), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.5840/jcp202411652

Guterres, A. (2023, July 27). Secretary-General's remarks on Climate Change. United Nations.

Hakam, H. T. (2024). Human-Written vs AI-Generated Texts in Orthopedic Academic Literature: Comparative Qualitative Analysis. JMIR Formative Research, 8, https://doi.org/10.2196/52164

International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO 704:2022 Terminology work — Principles and methods. Geneva: ISO.

Iqbal, I. (2023). Quo Vadis Filsafat Islam: Menelusuri dan Merumuskan Format Keilmuan. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Junaidi, J., Nazir, M., & Alpizar, A. (2024). Konsep Integrasi Sains dan Islam dalam Pendidikan. Jurnal An-Nur, 13(2), 92-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/an-nur.v13i2.35126

Kattsoff, L. O. (2004). Pengantar Filsafat (Soejono Soemargono, Terj.). Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Keraf, A. S., & Dua, M. (2001). Ilmu Pengetahuan: Sebuah Tinjauan Filosofis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (50th Anniversary Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Langan, K. A. (2021). The library language game: Information literacy through the lens of Wittgenstein. Communications in Information Literacy, 15(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.6

McKie, R. (2024, February 3). ‘The situation has become appalling’: fake scientific papers push research credibility to crisis point. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point

Navisa, F., & Subhan, R. (2025). Peran Filsafat Ilmu Dan Bahasa Indonesia Sebagai Media Komunikasi. Kampret Journal, 4(2), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.30743/bahastra.v9i2.10785

Ponton, D. M. (2024). Exploring Ecolinguistics: Ecological Principles and Narrative Practices. Bloomsbury.

Popper, K. (2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge Classics.

Pradana, A., Bandung, Y., Mahayana, D., & Rosmansyah, Y. (2024). Keamanan Data Internet of Things dalam Perspektif Pseudosains Mario Bunge. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 7(2), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i2.72435

Prayogi, A., & Nasrullah, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence dan Filsafat Ilmu: Bagaimana Filsafat Memandang Kecerdasan Buatan Sebagai Ilmu Pengetahuan. LogicLink, 144-155. https://doi.org/10.28918/logiclink.v1i2.8947

Riadi, D., Suradi, A., Sulistri, S., Anggita, L., & Norvaizi, I. (2025). Relevansi Ontologis dalam Perkembangan Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Abdurrauf Journal of Education and Islamic Studies, 2(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.70742/arjeis.v2i1.316

Rosa, A., Khasanah, M. L., Ramadhani, A., & Kurniawan, M. Y. (2025). Peran Filsafat Ilmu dalam Menghadapi Era Digital. Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Sosial Keagamaan, 2(4), 825-831. https://jurnal.ittc.web.id/index.php/jkis/article/view/2707

Saefurohman, A., & Ramadhani, S. N. (2024). Filsafat sains dan etika teknologi dalam penggunaan artificial intelligence. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(6), 1980-1985. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jiic/article/view/794

Serdianus. (2022). Quo Vadis Pendidikan di Era Artificial Intelligence? Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/sf7hc

Snoswell, A. J., Witzenberger, K., & El Masri, R. (2025, April 22). A weird phrase is plaguing scientific papers—and we traced it back to a glitch in AI data. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/weird-phrase-plaguing-scientific-papers-traced-to-glitch-in-ai-data/article69477304.ece

Socio.Health. (2024, May 2). Key differences between natural and social science research. Socio.Health. https://socio.health/research-methodology-population-family-health/natural-vs-social-science-research-differences/

Spinellis, D. (2025). False authorship: an explorative case study around an AI-generated article. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00165-z

Suriasumantri, J. S. (2007). Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Susanto, A. (2014). Filsafat Ilmu: Suatu Kajian Dalam Dimensi Ontologis, Epistemologi, Dan Aksiologis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

The Liang Gie. (2007). Pengantar Filsafat Ilmu. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Thornton, S. (2024). Karl Popper. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

UNESCO. (2021). AI and Education: Guidance for Policy-makers. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Vallor, S. (2024). The AI Mirror: How to Reclaim Our Humanity in an Age of Machine Thinking. Oxford University Press.

van Noorden, R. (2023). News in focus. Nature, 624, 479. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02719-5

Wilholt, T. (2013). Epistemic Trust in Science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64(2), 233-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axs007

Wüster, E. (1979). Einführung in die allgemeine Terminologielehre und terminologische Lexikographie. Springer.

Yang, L. L., Xu, S. Y., Yang, Z. Y., Zhao, Z. Y., & Shu, Q. (2022). Journal’s responsibility in maintaining scientific integrity. World Journal of Pediatrics, 18(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-021-00493-2

Downloads

Published

2026-01-15

How to Cite

Hertanto, Y. (2026). RELASI ONTOLOGIS BAHASA DAN SAINS: QUO VADIS FILSAFAT ILMU DI ERA DISRUPSI ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. EDUCATIONAL : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan & Pengajaran , 6(1), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.51878/educational.v6i1.8416

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.