AN ERROR ANALYSIS IN USING CORRELATIVE CONJUCTION IN EXPRESSING LIKE AND DISLIKE AT THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 3 SITOLU ORI IN 2023/2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/teaching.v4i4.3786Keywords:
Speaking, Correlative Conjuction, Error AnalysisAbstract
The purposes of the research is to analyze the types of errors and find out the sources of errors made by the eighth-grade students of SMP Negeri 3 Sitolu Ori on using correlative conjuction in expressing like and dislike. The method used in the research was descriptive qualitative. The analysis of the data was conducted by following the procedures of error analysis namely collect data, identification of error, description of error, explanation of error and evaluation of error. Furthermore, the informant of the research is class VIII–A students of SMP Negeri 3 Sitolu Ori which consisted of 20 students. The data will collect by took the video documentation of student speaking about expressing like and dislike and interview both of students and the English Teacher. Based on the explanation above, the researcher interests to do a research by entitling, “An Error Analysis on Using Correlative Conjuction In Expressing Like And Dislike At The Eighth Grade of SMP Negeri 3 Sitolu Ori in 2023/2024”
Downloads
References
Brown, D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy Second Edition. Addsison Wesley.
Brown, DouglasH. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy Second Edition. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley.
Creswel, John W. 2014, Educational Research. Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. US: Pearson.
Gay, L.R and Peter Airasian, 2018, educational research, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Guba, E. G. 1981.Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75- 91.Accessed on April 12th 2022.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. Teaching Speaking. Great Britain. MPG Group.
Hatch, E. and Farhady, H. 1982.Research Design and Statistical for Applied Linguistics. Los Angeles: New Bury House Publisher Inc.
Hughes, Arthur. 2003. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kothari C.R., 2004. Research Methodology Methods and Techniques. New Age International, New Delhi.
Moleong. 2003, Teaching Language as Communication. New York: Oxford University Press, 19778.
Nunan, David. 2001. Pratical English Language Teaching, Cambridge : CPU.
Richard, Jack.C. Renandya. 2008. Methodology in LanguageTeaching.CambridgeUniversity Press.
Richards, Jack C and Richard Schmidt. 2017. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3rd Ed., London: Pearson Education Limited.
RRobert, C. Bogdan, and Knopp, Sari Biklen, 2018. Qualitative Research for Education 5th Edition An Introduction to Theories and Methods. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Rivers, (2006: 162), The Random House Dictionary, USA.
Ronald, et al. 2001.The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages.Cambridge University Press.
Sandelowski M. 2018. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing &Health.23(4):334–340. Accessed on April 12th, 2022.
Sireci, Stephen, and Faulkner-Bond, Molly, 2014. Validity evidence based on test content. University of Massachusetts Amherst (USA).
Thomas, David R., 2018. A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. University of Auckland.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 TEACHING : Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
