FROM CHAOS TO CLARITY: HOW ENGLISH SYNTAX CREATES MEANING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/language.v6i1.9057Keywords:
English Syntax, Word Order, Meaning Construction, Ambiguity Resolution, Sentence Structure, Linguistic ClarityAbstract
This article examines the fundamental role of syntactic structure in constructing and determining meaning in the English language. Syntax is understood not merely as a set of formal rules, but as a cognitive framework that organizes lexical elements and transforms potential semantic chaos into clear and purposeful communication. This study employs a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach by using structured sentence examples to reveal the main syntactic mechanisms in English, particularly the relatively fixed word order of Subject–Verb–Object, hierarchical phrase structure, and the process of syntactic ambiguity resolution. The analysis shows that English syntax functions as a generative system that plays an important role in grammatical role assignment, the formation of complex propositions, and the creation of discourse cohesion. Furthermore, syntactic structure is proven to be a primary factor in meaning interpretation and sentence comprehension. These findings emphasize that mastery of syntactic principles is a crucial aspect in achieving clarity, accuracy, and effective communication, and has important implications for language teaching, academic writing, and linguistic studies in conceptual, pedagogical, and applicative dimensions within the context of modern English language learning in the global digital era.
ABSTRAK
Artikel ini mengkaji peran fundamental struktur sintaksis dalam membangun dan menentukan makna dalam bahasa Inggris. Sintaksis dipahami tidak sekadar sebagai seperangkat aturan formal, melainkan sebagai kerangka kognitif yang mengorganisasi unsur leksikal sehingga mampu mengubah potensi kekacauan makna menjadi komunikasi yang jelas dan terarah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif-analitis dengan memanfaatkan contoh-contoh kalimat terstruktur untuk mengungkap mekanisme sintaksis utama dalam bahasa Inggris, khususnya urutan kata yang relatif tetap Subject–Verb–Object, struktur hierarkis frasa, serta proses penyelesaian ambiguitas sintaktis. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa sintaksis bahasa Inggris berfungsi sebagai sistem generatif yang berperan penting dalam penentuan peran gramatikal, pembentukan proposisi kompleks, serta penciptaan kohesi wacana. Selain itu, struktur sintaksis terbukti menjadi faktor utama dalam penafsiran makna dan pemahaman kalimat. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa penguasaan prinsip-prinsip sintaksis merupakan aspek krusial dalam mencapai kejelasan, ketepatan, dan efektivitas komunikasi, serta memiliki implikasi penting bagi pengajaran bahasa, penulisan akademik, dan kajian linguistik secara konseptual, pedagogis, dan aplikatif dalam konteks pembelajaran bahasa Inggris modern di era global digital.
Downloads
References
Adger, D. (2019). Language unlimited: The science behind our most creative power. Oxford University Press.
Aliti, A. (2024). Exploring the Role of Syntax in Language Comprehension and Production. International Scientific Journal Monte (ISJM), 9(2). https://doi.org/10.33807/monte.20243121
Boeckx, C. (2021). Elementary syntactic structures: Prospects of a feature-free syntax. Cambridge University Press.
Boškovi?, Ž. (2021). On the locality of movement and the structure of clauses. In The Oxford handbook of syntactic theory (pp. 450-478). Oxford University Press.
Carnie, A. (2021). Syntax: A generative introduction (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Chomsky, N. (2020). The UCLA lectures. Language Science Press.
Clark, B. (2021). Relevance theory and discourse analysis: A broad framework. In The Cambridge handbook of discourse studies (pp. 19-38). Cambridge University Press.
Dehaene, S. (2020). How we learn: Why brains learn better than any machine...for now. Viking.
Everaert, M. B., Huybregts, M. A., Chomsky, N., Berwick, R. C., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2015). Structures, not strings: Linguistics as part of the cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.008
Futrell, R., Levy, R. P., & Gibson, E. (2020). Dependency locality as an explanatory principle for word order. Language, 96(2), 371-412. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0025
Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Piantadosi, S. P., Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L., & Levy, R. (2019). How efficiency shapes human language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003
Gibson, E., Tan, C., Futrell, R., Mahowald, K., Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., & Fedorenko, E. (2017). Don't underestimate the benefits of being misunderstood. Psychological Science, 28(6), 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617690277
Kehler, A., & Rohde, H. (2019). Prominence and coherence in a Bayesian theory of pronoun interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 154, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.004
Kusnadi, M. F., Bochari, S., Hastini, H., & Usman, S. (2024). A Syntactic Analysis of Sentence Patterns Made by the EFL Students of English Study Program. Jurnal Lingua Idea, 15(2), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jli.2024.15.2.9987
Liu, H. (2019). Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages. Routledge.
Monteza, A. M. M., & Hermansyah, S. (2025). Revisiting the Syntax–Semantics Interface: Theoretical, Empirical, and Computational Insights. Lingua : Journal of Linguistics and Language, 3(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.61978/lingua.v3i2.1045
Piantadosi, S. T., Minhas, S., & Gibson, E. (2022). The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition, 225, 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105119
Pylkkänen, L. (2020). Neural basis of basic composition: What we know, what we don’t, and why it matters. In The cognitive neuroscience of language (pp. 123-142). Routledge.
Raihana, A., Harahap, A., Dalimunte, A. F., Elvida Futri Mahara, Lubis, N. H., & Ismahani, S. (2024). The Importance of Syntax in Understanding English Sentence Structure. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(6), 8644–8651. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i6.16761
Ritonga, N., Zuhairya, N., Fitrah, G. A., Rahman, F., Nanda, M. F. D., & Ismahani, S. (2024). The impact of syntax-semantics awareness on English writing proficiency in undergraduate students. Journal on Teacher Education, 6(2), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.31004/jote.v6i2.37715
Sari, K. P. (2025). Appraising EFL Students’ Syntactic Competency of Word Formation in Argumentative Writing. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP, 12(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v12i1.13394
Sidabalok, E. H., Sinaga, S. M., Ompusunggu, R. F. I., & Manurung, C. D. (2025). An exploratory study of English syntax: Parts of speech, phrase structure, and sentence construction. JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA, 2(6), 822-831. https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v2i6.6334
Sportiche, D., Koopman, H., & Stabler, E. (2023). An introduction to syntactic analysis and theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
Tallerman, M. (2020). Understanding syntax (5th ed.). Routledge.
van Schijndel, M., & Linzen, T. (2021). Single-stage prediction models do not explain the magnitude of syntactic disambiguation difficulty. Cognitive Science, 45(6), e12988. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12988
van Valin, R. D., Jr. (2020). An introduction to syntax. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Faqih Hibatulah Z, Ajrul Khair, Mhd Ilham Khanis, Maulana Budi Satria Siregar, M. Rafly Raja Gazali Nahulae

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













