ANALISIS PENGULANGAN FOTO (REPEAT) DI INSTALASI RADIOLOGI RS PKU MUHAMMADIYAH KARANGANYAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/knowledge.v5i3.6956Keywords:
repeat, radiografi, citraAbstract
This research was motivated by the fact that a repeat analysis of radiographs had never been conducted in the Radiology Department of PKU Muhammadiyah Karanganyar Hospital, even though national standards, according to Minister of Health Regulation No. 129 of 2008, stipulate a repeat tolerance limit of below 2%. This lack of analysis has left the factors causing repeats unidentified, making it difficult to minimize them. Therefore, this study focused on measuring the repeat rate and identifying the primary causal factors. This study used a descriptive quantitative method and was conducted over three months. Data collection was conducted through observation, documentation, and interviews with radiographers, which were then analyzed as percentages. The results showed that the repeat rates for three consecutive months were 1.35%, 1.30%, and 1.43%, respectively. This finding demonstrates that the repeat rate at the hospital remains below the established threshold. The highest contributing factor to repeats was patient positioning errors (39.71%), followed by clipped objects (23.53%). It was concluded that although the repeat rate met the standard, ongoing evaluation focusing on patient positioning techniques is needed to further reduce the repeat rate.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh belum pernah dilakukannya analisis pengulangan foto radiografi (repeat analysis) di Instalasi Radiologi RS PKU Muhammadiyah Karanganyar, padahal standar nasional menurut Permenkes No. 129 Tahun 2008 menetapkan batas toleransi pengulangan di bawah 2%. Ketiadaan analisis ini menyebabkan faktor penyebab pengulangan tidak teridentifikasi sehingga sulit untuk diminimalisir. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini berfokus untuk mengukur besaran angka pengulangan foto dan mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor penyebab utamanya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif deskriptif yang dilaksanakan selama tiga bulan. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi, dokumentasi, dan wawancara dengan radiografer, yang kemudian dianalisis secara persentase. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa angka pengulangan foto selama tiga bulan berturut-turut adalah 1,35%, 1,30%, dan 1,43%. Temuan ini membuktikan bahwa tingkat pengulangan radiografi di rumah sakit tersebut masih berada di bawah ambang batas yang ditetapkan. Faktor penyebab pengulangan tertinggi adalah kesalahan dalam memposisikan pasien (39,71%), diikuti oleh objek terpotong (23,53%). Disimpulkan bahwa meskipun angka pengulangan sudah memenuhi standar, perlu adanya evaluasi berkelanjutan yang berfokus pada teknik pemosisian pasien untuk lebih menekan angka pengulangan.
References
Abuzaid, M., et al. (2015). The effect of digital imaging on radiography work practice. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 4(7), 141.
Alpert, H. R., & Hillman, B. J. (2004). Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 1(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2003.11.001
Amaliya, S. F., et al. (2025). Sistematik review perbandingan antara MRI dan PET/CT dalam mendeteksi metastasis kelenjar getah bening pada kanker serviks. HEALTHY Jurnal Inovasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan, 4(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.51878/healthy.v4i2.5873
Aryani, M., et al. (2024). Pengaruh kualitas pelayanan kesehatan terhadap minat kunjung kembali pasien ke Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kota Mataram. HEALTHY Jurnal Inovasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan, 3(4), 230. https://doi.org/10.51878/healthy.v3i4.4261
Bennett-Britton, I., et al. (2021). Continuous, risk-based, consultation peer review in out-of-hours general practice: A qualitative interview study of the benefits and limitations. British Journal of General Practice, 71(711). https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2021.0076
Cewe, P., et al. (2021). Radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different X-ray imaging systems: Investigations to minimize occupational exposure. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 14(11), 1139. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018220
Chen, L., et al. (2021). Variation in tube voltage for pediatric neck 64VCT: Effect on radiation dose and image quality. PLoS ONE, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259772
Geist, J. R. (2020). A new look at quality assurance in oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 129(4), 283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.12.011
Halim, S., et al. (2025). Tinjauan artikel laporan kasus pertimbangan pemasangan implan gigi pada pasien lanjut usia. CENDEKIA Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 5(2), 571. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v5i2.4744
Hanafi, A. S., et al. (2025). Fishbone analysis terhadap kelolosan defect fabric strategi perbaikan pada manajemen gudang tekstil. CENDEKIA Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 5(3), 1223. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v5i3.6506
Hantari, R., & Budi, H. (2021). Kepaniteraan di instalasi radiologi rumah sakit. Muhammadiyah Public Health Journal, 1(2), 139–154.
Iramanda, D. S. (2021). Quality Assurance (QA) dan Quality Control (QC) Cobalt. Jurnal Biosains Pascasarjana, 23(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.20473/jbp.v23i2.2021.61-74
Jumadewi, A., & Ichwansyah, F. (2025). Pembelajaran komunikasi dan promosi kesehatan bidang teknologi laboratorium medis melalui praktik penyuluhan. HEALTHY Jurnal Inovasi Riset Ilmu Kesehatan, 4(3), 91. https://doi.org/10.51878/healthy.v4i3.6155
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 780/MENKES/PER/VIII/2008 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Radiologi.
Kjelle, E., & Chilanga, C. C. (2022). The assessment of image quality and diagnostic value in X-ray images: A survey on radiographers’ reasons for rejecting images. Insights into Imaging, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01169-9
Obayda, Md. A., et al. (2023). Enhancing effective verbal communication between radiologic technologists and patients: Assessing the impact of service delivery in hospitals of Dhaka City. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 5(5), 110. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.5.1925
Papp, J. (2019). Quality management in the imaging sciences (6th ed.). Elsevier.
Peksi, N. J., et al. (2021). Classification of anemia with digital images of nails and palms using the naive bayes method. Telematika, 18(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.31315/telematika.v18i1.4587
Rosenkrantz, A. B., et al. (2017). Technologist-directed repeat musculoskeletal and chest radiographs: How often do they impact diagnosis? American Journal of Roentgenology, 209(6), 1297. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.17.18030
Sari, K., & Surahmi, N. (2022). Sistem kerja penangkap sinar-x pada pesawat computed radiography di RSUD Teuku Umar Calang dan sistem kerja penangkap sinar-x pada pesawat digital radiography di RSUD Datu Beru Takengon. Journal of Syntax Literate, 7(3).
Soularto, D. S., et al. (2022). Digital system pelaporan insiden keselamatan pasien di rumah sakit. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Pengabdian Masyarakat. https://doi.org/10.18196/ppm.43.635
van Vuuren, C. J., et al. (2021). Overcoming communication barriers in a multicultural radiography setting. Health SA Gesondheid, 26. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v26i0.1568
Wang, Y., et al. (2018). [P060] The effect of technical parameters in practice on abdominal and computed tomography (CT) dose. Physica Medica, 52, 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.383
Yoshandi, T. M., et al. (2020). Analisis pengulangan (repeat) citra radiografi di unit radiologi Rumah Sakit Awal Bros Panam Pekanbaru. Journal of Hospital Administration and Management, 1(2), 11–14.
