ANALISIS STRUKTUR KAJIAN PUSTAKA DALAM PENELITIAN TINDAKAN KELAS: SYTEMATIC LITERATUR RIVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/educator.v6i2.11052Keywords:
Kajian Pustaka, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Struktur Kajian, Kualitas PenelitianAbstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to identify patterns in the preparation of literature reviews within Classroom Action Research (CAR) and to analyze their influence on research quality from both conceptual and methodological perspectives. The study employed a systematic literature review (SLR) approach guided by PRISMA, using articles obtained from Scopus, Google Scholar, and SpringerLink. Data analysis was conducted through content analysis and thematic synthesis to identify patterns, consistency, and weaknesses in the construction of argument reviews in CAR studies. The findings reveal that the major arguments presented in CAR articles remain predominantly descriptive and have not been able to establish strong conceptual relationships between theory and empirical findings. Furthermore, there is still no consistent standard for the systematic organization of argument reviews, resulting in less optimal scientific reasoning and theoretical foundations within the research. This condition affects the weak construction of classroom action research designs and the low integration among the references used. The study emphasizes that the structure of argument reviews plays a strategic role in developing conceptual frameworks, strengthening academic arguments, and systematically improving research quality. The novelty of this study lies in proposing an argumentative, critical, and conceptually interconnected model of argument review as an effort to enhance the quality of CAR publications. These findings are expected to serve as practical guidance for researchers and academics in developing more systematic, argumentative, and relevant argument reviews aligned with the needs of educational research.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi pola penyusunan kajian pustaka dalam Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) serta menganalisis pengaruhnya terhadap kualitas penelitian secara konseptual dan metodologis. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan systematic literature review (SLR) dengan pedoman PRISMA terhadap artikel yang diperoleh dari Scopus, Google Scholar, dan SpringerLink. Analisis data dilakukan melalui content analysis dan thematic synthesis untuk menemukan pola, konsistensi, serta kelemahan dalam penyusunan kajian argumen PTK. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa argument besar kajian argumen pada artikel PTK masih bersifat deskriptif dan belum mampu membangun hubungan konseptual yang kuat antara teori dan temuan empiris. Selain itu, belum terdapat standar sistematika kajian argumen yang konsisten sehingga argumentasi ilmiah dan dasar teoritis penelitian menjadi kurang optimal. Kondisi tersebut berdampak pada lemahnya konstruksi desain penelitian tindakan kelas dan rendahnya integrasi antarreferensi yang digunakan. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa struktur kajian argumen memiliki peran strategis dalam membangun kerangka konseptual, memperkuat argumentasi akademik, dan meningkatkan kualitas penelitian secara sistematis. Novelty penelitian terletak pada penawaran model kajian argumen yang argumentatif, kritis, dan berbasis keterhubungan konseptual sebagai upaya meningkatkan mutu publikasi PTK. Temuan ini diharapkan menjadi acuan praktis bagi peneliti dan akademisi dalam menyusun kajian argumen yang lebih sistematis, argumentative, dan relevan dengan kebutuhan penelitian pendidikan.
Downloads
References
Aldridge, J. M., & McLure, F. I. (2024). Preparing schools for educational change: Barriers and supports—A systematic literature review. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 23(3), 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2023.2171439
Amarulloh, Herpratiwi, Firdaus, R., & Viyanti. (2026). A critical pedagogy-based andragogical self-learning framework for AI/IoT-enabled hybrid adult education: A systematic review and conceptual model development. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 28(1), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v28i1.66496
Andrade, H. L., Brookhart, S. M., & Yu, E. C. (2021). Classroom assessment as co-regulated learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 6, 751168. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.751168
Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00430-5
Castillo, D., Carrión, J., Chamba, C., Jiménez-Gaona, Y., Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. J., & Lakshminarayanan, V. (2025). Didactic strategies for conceptual understanding and motivation in university mathematics: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1536470. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1536470
Chen, P., Yang, D., Metwally, A. H. S., et al. (2023). Fostering computational thinking through unplugged activities: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00434-7
Chong, S. W., Lin, T. J., & Chen, Y. (2022). A methodological review of systematic literature reviews in higher education: Heterogeneity and homogeneity. Educational Research Review, 35, 100426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100426
Christ, A. A., Capon-Sieber, V., Grob, U., & Praetorius, A. K. (2022). Learning processes and their mediating role between teaching quality and student achievement: A systematic review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 101209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101209
Dorsah, P. (2026). A conceptual framework for blended learning: A systematic reviews. American Journal of Education and Technology, 5(1), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v5i1.7093
González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
Kamarudin, M. Z., & Mat Noor, M. S. A. (2024). What do we know about the selection of action research methodologies in primary science education?—A systematic literature review. Educational Action Research, 32(5), 825–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2261502
Khaldi, A., Bouzidi, R., & Nader, F. (2023). Gamification of e-learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z
Latif, R. A., Rizki, M., Hazmi, D., Nasution, W. N., & Haidir, H. (2025). Integrative framework of instructional strategies and learning design: A systematic conceptual literature review. FIKROTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Manajemen Islam, 14(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v14i2.1101
Luft, J. A., Jeong, S., Idsardi, R., & Gardner, G. (2022). Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An introduction for new biology education researchers. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(3), rm33. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134
Mahmudah, F. N., & Putra, E. C. S. (2021). Tinjauan pustaka sistematis manajemen pendidikan: Kerangka konseptual dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan era 4.0. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v9i1.33713
Martin, A. J. (2023). Integrating motivation and instruction: Towards a unified approach in educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09774
Martínez-Soto, T., & Prendes-Espinosa, P. (2023). A systematic review on the role of ICT and CLIL in compulsory education. Education Sciences, 13(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010073
Marzi, G., Balzano, M., Caputo, A., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2025). Guidelines for bibliometric-systematic literature reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 27(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12381
Matos, J. F., Piedade, J., Freitas, A., Pedro, N., Dorotea, N., Pedro, A., & Galego, C. (2023). Teaching and learning research methodologies in education: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020173
Meinokat, P., & Wagner, I. (2022). Causes, prevention, and interventions regarding classroom disruptions in digital teaching: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 4657–4684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10795-7
Mu, J., Bayrak, A., & Ufer, S. (2022). Conceptualizing and measuring instructional quality in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 7, 994739. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.994739
Nastiti, N., Widiarti, N., Subali, B., & Mujaki, A. (2025). Analisis tren integrasi lembar kerja peserta didik (LKPD) dan project based learning (PjBL) dalam pendidikan dasar: Systematic review 2021–2025. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia, 5(8), 2213–2227. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.952
Naveed, Q. N., Choudhary, H., Ahmad, N., Alqahtani, J., & Qahmash, A. I. (2023). Mobile learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(18), 13566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813566
Nguyen, K. A., Borrego, M., Finelli, C. J., et al. (2021). Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7
Rapanta, C., & Felton, M. K. (2022). Learning to argue through dialogue: A review of instructional approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2
Rojas-Sánchez, M. A., Palos-Sánchez, P. R., & Folgado-Fernández, J. A. (2023). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 155–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11167-5
Ryan, A. W., Kolås, L., Nilsen, A. G., et al. (2024). Systematic literature review as a digital collaborative research-like learning activity: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 5243–5257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11997-x
Sulistiyo, U., Haryanto, E., Fajaryani, N., & Angraini, D. (2025). Enhancing EFL undergraduates’ academic writing through project-based learning: A systematic review (2019–2025) within an outcome-based education framework. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(2), 1045–1062. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.862
Tondeur, J., Petko, D., Christensen, R., et al. (2021). Quality criteria for conceptual technology integration models in education: Bridging research and practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2187–2208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09911-0
Turner, J. R., Allen, J., Hawamdeh, S., & Mastanamma, G. (2023). The multifaceted sensemaking theory: A systematic literature review and content analysis on sensemaking. Systems, 11(3), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11030145
Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Garrido-Arroyo, M. C., Burgos-Videla, C., & Morales-Cevallos, M. B. (2020). Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2009–2018). Sustainability, 12(12), 5153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125153
Zhong, L. (2023). A systematic review of personalized learning in higher education: Learning content structure, learning materials sequence, and learning readiness support. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 7053–7073. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2061006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 EDUCATOR : Jurnal Inovasi Tenaga Pendidik dan Kependidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
