ANALISIS PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN DARING PADA MAHASISWA STIE TRIDHARMA PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 TERHADAP KEPUASAN MAHASISWA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/educational.v2i2.1258Keywords:
Pengaruh Covid-19, Sistem Pembelajaran Daring, Kepuasan MahasiswaAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of online learning on STIE Tridharma Bandung students' satisfaction during the Covid-19 pandemic. The research was conducted with a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis. The number of student respondents was 104 people consisting of active students from the Management Study Program and the Accounting Study Program. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the majority of students (97.1%) already have devices for online learning, so that students can easily access online learning technology. However, students still experience problems in monitoring the development of online materials, the ease of obtaining materials, and at the same time studying online learning materials. Students also considered that the online learning method applied was not appropriate, but they were relatively satisfied with the online learning method, and the ability of the lecturers.
ABSTRAK
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh pembelajaran daring terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa STIE Tridharma Bandung pada masa pandemi. Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisa deskriptif. Jumlah responden mahasiswa adalah 104 orang terdiri mahasiswa aktif dari Prodi Manajemen dan Prodi Akuntansi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa mayoritas mahasiswa (97,1%) telah memiliki perangkat untuk pembelajaran daring, sehingga mahasiswa dapat mengakses dengan mudah teknologi pembelajaran daring. Namun mahasiswa masih mengalami kendala dalam memantau perkembangan materi daring, kemudahan memperoleh materi dan sekaligus mempelajari materi pembelajaran daring. Mahasiswa juga menganggap bahwa metode pembelajaran daring yang diterapkan belum dirasakan tepat, tetapi relatif puas terhadap metode pembelajaran daring, dan kemampuan dosen.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, S., Ayoob, T., Malik, A. and Memon, S.I. (2020), “Perceptions of students regarding E-learning during Covid-19 at a private medical college”, Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 36, pp. S57-S61, doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2766.
Bolliger, D. U. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-learning, 3(1), 61–67.
Carver, D. L. (2014). Analysis of student perceptions of the psychosocial learning environment in online and face-to-face career and technical education courses. Dissertation. Old Dominion University
Ehlers, U. D. (2004). Quality in e-learning from a learner’s perspective. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 7(1), 1-8.
Enriquez, M.A.S. (2014), Students’ Perceptions on the Effectiveness of the Use of Edmodo as a Supplementary Tool for Learning, DLSU Research Congress 201
F. Colace, M. De Santo, A. Pietrosanto, (2006). Evaluation models for e-learning platform: an AHP approach, in: Frontiers in Education Conference, 36th Annual, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, San Diego, CA,
F. Fu, Comparison of Students’ Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction Factors in Different Classroom Types in Higher Education, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6248, pp. 415-426, October, 2010.
Firman & Sari R.R. Pembelajaran on line ditengah pandemi Covid-19, Indonesian Journal of Educational Science (IJES), Volume 02, No 02 Maret 2020.
Gikas, J., & Grant, M. (2013), Mobile Computing Devise in Higher Eduction: Student Perspectives on Learning With Cellphone, Smartphones & Social Media. Internet and Higher Education,
Huang, R., Tlili, A., Chang, T. W., Zhang, X., Nascimbeni, F., & Burgos, D. (2020). Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: Application of open educational practices and resources. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1–15.
Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google Classroom: What Work and How? Journal of Education and Social Science, Vol. 3 (Feb), https://jesoc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/KC3_35.pdf
J. Potomkova, V. Mihal, C. Cihalik, (2006). Web-based instructionand its impact on the learning activity of medical students: a review, Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Palacky Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. 150.
Jurkovic, V, (2019) Online informal learning of English through Smartphones in Slovenia. System, 80, 27-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.10.007
Korucu, A. T., & Alkan, A. (2011). Differences Between M-Learning (Mobile Learning) and E=Learning, Basic Terminology and Usage of M-Learning in Education, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 15. https://doi.org/10.106/j.sbspro.2011.04.029
Kumar, V., & Nanda, P. (2018), Social Media in Higher Eduction. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education.
Kuntarto, E. (2017). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Daring Dalam Perkuliahan Bahasa Indonesia Diperguruan Tinggi. Indonesia Language Education And Literature, 3(1),99-110.
Milligan, A. T., & Buckenmeyer, J. A. (2008). Assessing students for online learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(3), 449–461.
Moore, J.L., Dickson – Deane, C., & Gayen, K., (2011). E- Learning,and Distance Learning Environtment: are They The Same? Internet and High Education.
Ni AY. Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. J Public Aff Educ 2013;19:199-215.
Nikou, S. & Maslov, I. (2021), An analysis of students’ perspectives on e-learning participation – the case of COVID-19 pandemic, The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38 (3), 1-17
Nurhizam Safie Mohd Satar, Azizan H. Morshidi, Omkar Dastane (2020). Success Factors for e-Learning Satisfaction during COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown, International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, Volume 9, No.5
Özkök, A., Walker, S. L., & Büyüköztürk, ?. (2009). Reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the DELES. Learning Environments Research, 12(3), 175–190.
Restrepo, E. G. y., Benavidez., C., & Guiterrez, H. (2012). The challenge of teaching to créate acessible learning objects to higher education lecturers, Procedia Computer Science, 13, 371-381.
S. Childs, E. Blenkinsopp, A. Hall, G. Walton, (2005). Effective e-learning for health professionals and students-barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature-findings from the HeXL project, Health Inf. Libr. J. 22 (2)
Seiver, J. G., & Troja, A. (2014). Satisfaction and success in online learning as a function of the needs for affiliation, autonomy, and mastery. Distance Education, 35(1), 90–105.
Sicat, A. S. (2015). Enhancing College Student Proficiency in Bussiness Writing via Schoology. International Journal of Education and Research.
So, S (2016). Mobile Instant Messaging Support For Teaching And Learning In Higer Education. Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 31 October. 32-42
T. Teo, “A structural equation modelling of factors influencing student teachers’ satisfaction with e-learning,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 150–152, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01110.x.
Thurmond, V., & Wambach, K. (2004). Understanding interactions in distance education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1(1), np
Walker, S. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: The distance education learning environments survey (DELES). Learning Environments Research, 8(3), 289–308.
Widarti, Ari, I. A Eka Padmiari dan ketut Lilik Arwati, 2008, Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa terhadap Proses Belajar Mengajar di Jurusan Gizi POLTEKES DEPKES Denpasar, Jurnal Skala Husada, Vol.5. No.2. 163-167
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 EDUCATIONAL : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan & Pengajaran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
