PENGARUH MOTIVASI KERJA DAN PERSEPSI DUKUNGAN ORGANISASI TERHADAP PERILAKU PROAKTIF PENELITIAN (STUDI KASUS PADA DOSEN DI POLITEKNIK LP3I JAKARTA): PENDEKATAN TEORI DETERMINASI DIRI

Authors

  • Hanifah Fauziyah Nibras Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung
  • Sunu Widianto Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v5i1.3051

Keywords:

Motivasi Kerja, Persepsi Dukungan Organisasi, Perilaku Proaktif Penelitian

Abstract

The large number of lecturers and universities does not necessarily result in high research publications because Indonesian research publications are still low at the international level. This study aims to determine work motivation and perceptions of organizational support for proactive research behavior (case study of lecturers at the LP3I Jakarta Polytechnic): a self-determination theory approach. This study uses quantitative research with a sample of 99 lecturers at the LP3I Jakarta Polytechnic. The results show that work motivation, both intrinsic and extrinsic, significantly encourages proactive behavior. Motivated lecturers tend to be more initiative and oriented towards improving performance. In addition, perceptions of organizational support also have a positive effect; lecturers who feel supported tend to be more proactive. Simultaneously, these two variables explain 64% of the variance in proactive behavior, underlining the importance of internal and external factors. The implication is that the LP3I Jakarta Polytechnic needs to apply a holistic approach, combining the development of lecturers' work motivation (through training, recognition, etc.) with the creation of a supportive environment (constructive feedback, resources, etc.). This integrated strategy will foster proactive behavior, which ultimately improves the quality of the institution.

ABSTRAK
Banyaknya dosen dan perguruan tinggi tidak serta merta menjadikan publikasi hasil penelitian menjadi tinggi karena  publikasi hasil penelitian Indonesia masih rendah di tingkat internasional.  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui motivasi kerja dan persepsi dukungan organisasi terhadap perilaku proaktif penelitian (studi kasus pada dosen di politeknik LP3I Jakarta): pendekatan teori determinasi diri. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah dosen Politeknik LP3I Jakarta sejumlah 99 orang. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa motivasi kerja, baik intrinsik maupun ekstrinsik, secara signifikan mendorong perilaku proaktif. Dosen yang termotivasi cenderung lebih inisiatif dan berorientasi pada peningkatan kinerja. Selain itu, persepsi dukungan organisasi juga berpengaruh positif; dosen yang merasa didukung cenderung lebih proaktif. Secara simultan, kedua variabel ini menjelaskan 64% varians perilaku proaktif, menggarisbawahi pentingnya faktor internal dan eksternal. Implikasinya, Politeknik LP3I Jakarta perlu menerapkan pendekatan holistik, memadukan pengembangan motivasi kerja dosen (melalui pelatihan, pengakuan, dll.) dengan penciptaan lingkungan yang mendukung (umpan balik konstruktif, sumber daya, dll.). Strategi terintegrasi ini akan menumbuhkan perilaku proaktif, yang pada akhirnya meningkatkan kualitas institusi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Deci, E. L., et al. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: State of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behaviour, 4, 19-43.

Eisenberger, R., et al. (2020). Perceived organizational support: Why caring about employees counts. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 101–124.

Eisenberger, R., et al. (2020). Perceived organizational support: Why caring about employees counts. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 101–124.

Farmanesh, P., et al. (2021). Mapping the relationship between proactive behaviour and talent management practices; The mediating role of organization commitment. Journal Applied Research in Higher Education.

Farmanesh, P., et al. (2021). Mapping the relationship between proactive behaviour and talent management practices; The mediating role of organization commitment. Journal Applied Research in Higher Education.

Hair, J. F., et al. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

Hastho Joko Nur Utomo, et al. (2023). Investigating the role of innovative work behavior, organizational trust, perceived organizational support: An empirical study on smes performance. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 21(3).

Ismail, H., et al. (2022). Determination of work motivation, leadership style, employee competence on job satisfaction and employee performance. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 2(1), 47-58.

Jiang, W., et al. (2017). The impact of transformational leadership on employee sustainable performance: The mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior. Sustainability, 9(9), 1567.

Kock, N. (2016). Hypothesis testing with confidence intervals and P values in PLS-SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 12(3), 1–6.

Li, X. (2020). The preliminary literature review of proactive behavior. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10, 915–919. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2020.105061

Li, X. (2020). The preliminary literature review of proactive behavior. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10, 915–919.

Rasheed, M. I., et al. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ motivation: An HRM challenge for public sector higher educational institutions of Pakistan (HEIs). International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 101-114.

Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Self-determination theory in human resource development: New directions and practical considerations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(2), 133–147.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sabir, I., et al. (2022). The impact of perceived organizational support on the performance of employees in IT companies – a comparison between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(3), 795–815.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2017). Metode penelitian untuk bisnis: Pendekatan pengembangan-keahlian (Edisi 6, Buku 1, Cetakan Kedua). Salemba Empat.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Susmiati, & Sudarma, K. (2015). Pengaruh budaya organisasi dan dukungan organisasi persepsian terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan komitmen organisasi sebagai variabel intervening. Management Analysis Journal, 4(1), 79–87.

Tjandra, H. C., et al. (2018). Pengaruh perceived organizational support terhadap komitmen afektif karyawan hotel di Surabaya. Jurnal Hospitality Dan Manajemen Jasa, 6(2), 510–523.

Xi Li. (2020). The Preliminary Literature Review of Proactive Behaviour. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10, 915-919.

Yamin, S., & Kurniawan, H. (2011). Generasi baru mengolah data penelitian dengan Partial Least Square Path Modeling: Aplikasi dengan Software XLSTAT, SmartPLS, dan Visual PLS. Salemba Infotek.

Yani, M., et al. (2021). The Relationship Between Work Motivation, Work Discipline And Employee Performance At The Regional Secretariat Of Bogorcity. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 2(2), 89-99.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-27

How to Cite

Nibras, H. F. ., & Widianto, S. . (2025). PENGARUH MOTIVASI KERJA DAN PERSEPSI DUKUNGAN ORGANISASI TERHADAP PERILAKU PROAKTIF PENELITIAN (STUDI KASUS PADA DOSEN DI POLITEKNIK LP3I JAKARTA): PENDEKATAN TEORI DETERMINASI DIRI. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan , 5(1), 360-371. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v5i1.3051

Issue

Section

Articles